[NSRCA-discussion] Fw: Judging . . . . . .

[J N Hiller]

Matt Some of us seasoned long timers remember. I found it very interesting.

Here are some links for those unfamiliar with the NSRCA site.
http://nsrca.us/documents/judging/judgeevaluation/Judge_Evaluation_Method.pd
f
http://nsrca.us/documents/judging/judgeevaluation/Judge_Evaluation_Scores_20
07.pdf
http://nsrca.us/documents/judging/certifiedjudges/2011_Certified_Judges_List
.pdf

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of
rcmaster199 at aol.com
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 8:05 AM
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Fw: Judging . . . . . .

Geez,

Goes to show you that even long timers in the sport don't pay much
attention...

There indeed is a statistical analysis method we applied for several years
to score Judging performances. It obviously fell on deaf ears and blind eyes
so we stopped.

Matt Kebabjian
>
> *Subject:* [NSRCA-discussion] Fw: Judging . . . . . .
>
> Actually, no.
> But,
> at least up until now, no one has been willing to propose using
> any statisical analysis on the judges performance.
> .
> Bob Kane
>  getterflash at yahoo.com <mailto:getterflash at yahoo.com>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20111212/a845ad0a/attachment.html>