[NSRCA-discussion] Max volts - fresh comparison?

brian young brian_w_young at yahoo.com
Thu Mar 4 09:28:20 AKST 2010


We had a guy come to our club who was a very very proficient foamy flier, tended to do that exclusively for awhile and he got sponsored into IMAC flying. His 40% IMAC planes snaps looked just like foamy snaps, really funny to watch....i would set back and say 0, 0, 0, ...... but he would do some amazing stuff otherwise.

E flying I think is low wear, easy setup, less maintenance. Scales are balanced I imagine disadvantage vs. advantages. 

Brian




________________________________
From: "Woodward, Jim R (US SSA)" <jim.woodward at baesystems.com>
To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Thu, March 4, 2010 8:42:50 AM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Max volts - fresh comparison?

I did not list the "down-side" to glow and I know there is some.  For me, that is the funnest thing to run.  Also, E-pattern planes seem to promote a "foamy" flying style if there are not glow planes around to offset the presentation. 

I love the indoor electrics, and small outdoor stuff.  Electric has its place for sure.  I just don't really see the justification of the entire E-setup infrastructure, given the reduced flight times.  I'll take more practice time per flight.  
Thanks,
Jim




-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Ron Van Putte
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 8:28 AM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Max volts - fresh comparison?

The E-Flier is getting "no slime".

Ron

On Mar 4, 2010, at 7:22 AM, Woodward, Jim R (US SSA) wrote:

>

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion



      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20100304/3a3acb99/attachment.html>


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list