[NSRCA-discussion] S.bus

[Bob Kane]

I think Ron VP collaborated with Tesla, he may have some first-hand insight . . .

Bob Kane
getterflash at yahoo.com


--- On Fri, 7/9/10, mjfrederick at cox.net <mjfrederick at cox.net> wrote:

> From: mjfrederick at cox.net <mjfrederick at cox.net>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] S.bus
> To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Date: Friday, July 9, 2010, 4:09 PM
> Tesla did a lot of experiments trying
> to transmit electricity through the air, maybe we need to
> dig up some of his research?
> 
> Matt
> ---- "Atwood wrote: 
> I've been saying that for years...if only we could have
> wireless power we'd be there.
> 
> I'd also like to see Bluetooth Buddy Box systems.
> 
> Mark Atwood
> Paragon Consulting, Inc.  |  President
> 5885 Landerbrook Drive Suite 130, Cleveland Ohio, 44124
> Phone: 440.684.3101 x102  |  Fax: 440.684.3102
> mark.atwood at paragon-inc.com<mailto:mark.atwood at paragon-inc.com> 
> |  www.paragon-inc.com<http://www.paragon-inc.com/>
> 
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]
> On Behalf Of John Fuqua
> Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 12:06 PM
> To: 'General pattern discussion'
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] S.bus
> 
> What would be really cool is a system with wireless
> servos.   Sort of a mini Wi-Fi hotspot. 
> Now that would be really  useful.
> 
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]
> On Behalf Of Jon Lowe
> Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 10:09 AM
> To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] S.bus
> 
> There is a great article on latency here:
> 
> http://www.rcmodelreviews.com/what_is_latency.shtml
> 
> A lot of people are hung up on transmitter/receiver latency
> numbers, and don't see the whole picture.  This gives
> as good a fact based write up as any I've seen.
> Jon Lowe
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Fuqua <johnfuqua at embarqmail.com>
> To: 'General pattern discussion' <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Sent: Fri, Jul 9, 2010 8:48 am
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] S.bus
> 
> How fast is anyone able to practically see a faster
> "command repetition
> 
> rate" anyway and relate it to some surface
> movement???   We are all ready at
> 
> instantaneous
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> 
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org>
> 
> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org?>]
> On Behalf Of Ed Alt
> 
> Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 8:03 AM
> 
> To: General pattern discussion
> 
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] S.bus
> 
> 
> 
> Not only could the command repetition rate be increased,
> but you now have a
> 
> comms bus that will support duplex communication. 
> This is a great way to
> 
> add telemetry devices.
> 
> 
> 
> Ed
> 
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------
> 
> From: "James Oddino" <joddino at socal.rr.com<mailto:joddino at socal.rr.com>>
> 
> Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 1:26 AM
> 
> To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>>
> 
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] S.bus
> 
> 
> 
> > I was thinking that maybe now without the pulse width
> interface, they
> 
> > could have three times the rep rate with a digital
> interface, but who
> 
> > knows.  There was a time when I knew what was
> going on inside RC systems
> 
> > so I could decide what was best.  Futaba doesn't
> seem to care, or maybe
> 
> > the marketing guys don't know what is important.
> 
> >
> 
> > Jim
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> > On Jul 8, 2010, at 8:10 PM, Ed Alt wrote:
> 
> >
> 
> >> The only thing I would want to see is a redundant
> connection option.  As
> 
> >> neat as the single bus is, one connection failure
> at the serial driver
> 
> >> source does you in no matter what.  Some
> redundancy is really needed to
> 
> >> make this have more appeal IMO.  Still a
> really good step forward though.
> 
> >>
> 
> >>
> --------------------------------------------------
> 
> >> From: "Bill's Email" <wemodels at cox.net<mailto:wemodels at cox.net>>
> 
> >> Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2010 5:02 PM
> 
> >> To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>>
> 
> >> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] S.bus
> 
> >>
> 
> >>> There is a whole page of info as well on the
> Futaba FASST Site:
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>> http://2.4gigahertz.com/sbus/index.html
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>>
> _______________________________________________
> 
> >>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> 
> >>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> 
> >>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 
> >> _______________________________________________
> 
> >> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> 
> >> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> 
> >> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 
> >
> 
> > _______________________________________________
> 
> > NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> 
> > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> 
> > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> 
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> 
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> 
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> 
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>