[NSRCA-discussion] S.bus

[mjfrederick at cox.net]

Tesla did a lot of experiments trying to transmit electricity through the air, maybe we need to dig up some of his research?

Matt
---- "Atwood wrote: 
I've been saying that for years...if only we could have wireless power we'd be there.

I'd also like to see Bluetooth Buddy Box systems.

Mark Atwood
Paragon Consulting, Inc.  |  President
5885 Landerbrook Drive Suite 130, Cleveland Ohio, 44124
Phone: 440.684.3101 x102  |  Fax: 440.684.3102
mark.atwood at paragon-inc.com<mailto:mark.atwood at paragon-inc.com>  |  www.paragon-inc.com<http://www.paragon-inc.com/>

From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of John Fuqua
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 12:06 PM
To: 'General pattern discussion'
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] S.bus

What would be really cool is a system with wireless servos.   Sort of a mini Wi-Fi hotspot.  Now that would be really  useful.

From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Jon Lowe
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 10:09 AM
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] S.bus

There is a great article on latency here:

http://www.rcmodelreviews.com/what_is_latency.shtml

A lot of people are hung up on transmitter/receiver latency numbers, and don't see the whole picture.  This gives as good a fact based write up as any I've seen.
Jon Lowe

-----Original Message-----
From: John Fuqua <johnfuqua at embarqmail.com>
To: 'General pattern discussion' <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Fri, Jul 9, 2010 8:48 am
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] S.bus

How fast is anyone able to practically see a faster "command repetition

rate" anyway and relate it to some surface movement???   We are all ready at

instantaneous



-----Original Message-----

From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org>

[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org?>] On Behalf Of Ed Alt

Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 8:03 AM

To: General pattern discussion

Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] S.bus



Not only could the command repetition rate be increased, but you now have a

comms bus that will support duplex communication.  This is a great way to

add telemetry devices.



Ed



--------------------------------------------------

From: "James Oddino" <joddino at socal.rr.com<mailto:joddino at socal.rr.com>>

Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 1:26 AM

To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>>

Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] S.bus



> I was thinking that maybe now without the pulse width interface, they

> could have three times the rep rate with a digital interface, but who

> knows.  There was a time when I knew what was going on inside RC systems

> so I could decide what was best.  Futaba doesn't seem to care, or maybe

> the marketing guys don't know what is important.

>

> Jim

>

>

> On Jul 8, 2010, at 8:10 PM, Ed Alt wrote:

>

>> The only thing I would want to see is a redundant connection option.  As

>> neat as the single bus is, one connection failure at the serial driver

>> source does you in no matter what.  Some redundancy is really needed to

>> make this have more appeal IMO.  Still a really good step forward though.

>>

>> --------------------------------------------------

>> From: "Bill's Email" <wemodels at cox.net<mailto:wemodels at cox.net>>

>> Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2010 5:02 PM

>> To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>>

>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] S.bus

>>

>>> There is a whole page of info as well on the Futaba FASST Site:

>>>

>>> http://2.4gigahertz.com/sbus/index.html

>>>

>>>

>>> _______________________________________________

>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list

>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>

>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

>> _______________________________________________

>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list

>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>

>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

>

> _______________________________________________

> NSRCA-discussion mailing list

> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>

> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

>

_______________________________________________

NSRCA-discussion mailing list

NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>

http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion



_______________________________________________

NSRCA-discussion mailing list

NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>

http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion