[NSRCA-discussion] S.bus

[Ronald Van Putte]

Aeronautical engineer, not electrical engineer.

Ron VP

On Jul 9, 2010, at 8:14 PM, Bob Kane wrote:

> I think Ron VP collaborated with Tesla, he may have some first-hand  
> insight . . .
>
> Bob Kane
> getterflash at yahoo.com
>
>
> --- On Fri, 7/9/10, mjfrederick at cox.net <mjfrederick at cox.net> wrote:
>
>> From: mjfrederick at cox.net <mjfrederick at cox.net>
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] S.bus
>> To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>> Date: Friday, July 9, 2010, 4:09 PM
>> Tesla did a lot of experiments trying
>> to transmit electricity through the air, maybe we need to
>> dig up some of his research?
>>
>> Matt
>> ---- "Atwood wrote:
>> I've been saying that for years...if only we could have
>> wireless power we'd be there.
>>
>> I'd also like to see Bluetooth Buddy Box systems.
>>
>> Mark Atwood
>> Paragon Consulting, Inc.  |  President
>> 5885 Landerbrook Drive Suite 130, Cleveland Ohio, 44124
>> Phone: 440.684.3101 x102  |  Fax: 440.684.3102
>> mark.atwood at paragon-inc.com<mailto:mark.atwood at paragon-inc.com>
>> |  www.paragon-inc.com<http://www.paragon-inc.com/>
>>
>> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
>> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]
>> On Behalf Of John Fuqua
>> Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 12:06 PM
>> To: 'General pattern discussion'
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] S.bus
>>
>> What would be really cool is a system with wireless
>> servos.   Sort of a mini Wi-Fi hotspot.
>> Now that would be really  useful.
>>
>> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
>> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]
>> On Behalf Of Jon Lowe
>> Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 10:09 AM
>> To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] S.bus
>>
>> There is a great article on latency here:
>>
>> http://www.rcmodelreviews.com/what_is_latency.shtml
>>
>> A lot of people are hung up on transmitter/receiver latency
>> numbers, and don't see the whole picture.  This gives
>> as good a fact based write up as any I've seen.
>> Jon Lowe
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: John Fuqua <johnfuqua at embarqmail.com>
>> To: 'General pattern discussion' <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>> Sent: Fri, Jul 9, 2010 8:48 am
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] S.bus
>>
>> How fast is anyone able to practically see a faster
>> "command repetition
>>
>> rate" anyway and relate it to some surface
>> movement???   We are all ready at
>>
>> instantaneous
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>>
>> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca- 
>> discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org>
>>
>> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca- 
>> discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org?>]
>> On Behalf Of Ed Alt
>>
>> Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 8:03 AM
>>
>> To: General pattern discussion
>>
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] S.bus
>>
>>
>>
>> Not only could the command repetition rate be increased,
>> but you now have a
>>
>> comms bus that will support duplex communication.
>> This is a great way to
>>
>> add telemetry devices.
>>
>>
>>
>> Ed
>>
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------
>>
>> From: "James Oddino"  
>> <joddino at socal.rr.com<mailto:joddino at socal.rr.com>>
>>
>> Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 1:26 AM
>>
>> To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca- 
>> discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>>
>>
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] S.bus
>>
>>
>>
>>> I was thinking that maybe now without the pulse width
>> interface, they
>>
>>> could have three times the rep rate with a digital
>> interface, but who
>>
>>> knows.  There was a time when I knew what was
>> going on inside RC systems
>>
>>> so I could decide what was best.  Futaba doesn't
>> seem to care, or maybe
>>
>>> the marketing guys don't know what is important.
>>
>>>
>>
>>> Jim
>>
>>>
>>
>>>
>>
>>> On Jul 8, 2010, at 8:10 PM, Ed Alt wrote:
>>
>>>
>>
>>>> The only thing I would want to see is a redundant
>> connection option.  As
>>
>>>> neat as the single bus is, one connection failure
>> at the serial driver
>>
>>>> source does you in no matter what.  Some
>> redundancy is really needed to
>>
>>>> make this have more appeal IMO.  Still a
>> really good step forward though.
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>
>> --------------------------------------------------
>>
>>>> From: "Bill's Email" <wemodels at cox.net<mailto:wemodels at cox.net>>
>>
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2010 5:02 PM
>>
>>>> To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca- 
>>>> discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca- 
>>>> discussion at lists.nsrca.org>>
>>
>>>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] S.bus
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>> There is a whole page of info as well on the
>> Futaba FASST Site:
>>
>>>>>
>>
>>>>> http://2.4gigahertz.com/sbus/index.html
>>
>>>>>
>>
>>>>>
>>
>>>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>
>>>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA- 
>>>>> discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>>
>>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>
>>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA- 
>>>> discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>>
>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>>>
>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>
>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA- 
>>> discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>>
>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA- 
>> discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>>
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA- 
>> discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>>
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion