[NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes

[Vicente "Vince" Bortone]

Your sisters must be popular.  Never seen a lady in that business . 



Vicente "Vince" Bortone 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mark Atwood" < atwoodm @paragon-inc.com> 
To: " nsrca -discussion at lists. nsrca .org" < nsrca -discussion at lists. nsrca .org> 
Sent: Friday, January 1, 2010 10:47:49 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central 
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes 

Eh, bothof my  Sisters are boilermakers so I can't really rag on them. 
-------------------------- 
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld 


----- Original Message ----- 
From: nsrca -discussion-bounces at lists. nsrca .org < nsrca -discussion-bounces at lists. nsrca .org> 
To: General pattern discussion < nsrca -discussion at lists. nsrca .org> 
Sent: Fri Jan 01 23:55:37 2010 
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes 

Hmmmm .  Mark somehow failed to mention Purdue. 

Ron 

On Jan 1, 2010, at 10:22 PM, Atwood, Mark wrote: 

> Hello?  That's POISONOUS nut! 
> 
> Wolverines - Breakfast of Champions!!!! 
> 
> GO BUCKS!! 
> -------------------------- 
> Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: nsrca -discussion-bounces at lists. nsrca .org < nsrca -discussion- 
> bounces at lists. nsrca .org> 
> To: General pattern discussion < nsrca -discussion at lists. nsrca .org> 
> Sent: Fri Jan 01 23:37:29 2010 
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes 
> 
> Buckeye - Look in the dictionary.  It says " a worthless nut". 
> 
> Ron Van Putte 
> BS - Purdue; MS and A& AE - Michigan 
> 
> On Jan 1, 2010, at 8:47 PM, Budd Engineering wrote: 
> 
>> Hey Mark, 
>> 
>> Are those squirrels (the steroid enhanced gray ones) available.  I 
>> thought they all were playing for the Buckeyes?!! 
>> 
>> : ) 
>> 
>> (Happy New Year!!) 
>> 
>> Jerry 
>> 
>> Budd Engineering 
>> jerry @ buddengineering .com 
>> http :// www . buddengineering .com 
>> 
>> On Jan 1, 2010, at 6:02 PM, Atwood, Mark wrote: 
>> 
>>> I think we ought to make a weight change to encourage squirril 
>>> power.  Its "green" with biodegradable emissions, but right now I 
>>> can only get adequate power with the heavier bulky steriod 
>>> enhanced grey squirrils which make me overweight ... 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -------------------------- 
>>> Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>> From: nsrca -discussion-bounces at lists. nsrca .org < nsrca -discussion- 
>>> bounces at lists. nsrca .org> 
>>> To: General pattern discussion < nsrca -discussion at lists. nsrca .org> 
>>> Sent: Fri Jan 01 20:47:46 2010 
>>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes 
>>> 
>>> Making weight with an SAP-180 is easier than with a YS 170 CDI . 
>>> The power doesn ’t compare, but from a weight perspective, it's no 
>>> real issue. 
>>> 
>>> Ed 
>>> 
>>> From: Daniel McLalin <mailto:dmclalin at gmail.com> 
>>> Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 8:35 PM 
>>> To: General pattern discussion <mailto: nsrca - 
>>> discussion at lists. nsrca .org> 
>>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>                 John, 
>>>          
>>> 
>>> I just happened to read the discussion on RCU about the SAP 140 
>>> and it occurred to me that maybe this is why raising the weight 
>>> limit should be considered.  This does not mean I agree, but just 
>>> for thought. 
>>> 
>>>                 , electrics want a weight break because their fuel tanks are 
>>> heavy but their fuel is light; because two strokes aren't 
>>> competitive any more we ought to have a high minimum weight for 4- 
>>> strokes and electrics to level the playing field; and I want a 
>>> weight break because I added 4 oz when I put ignition on my YS's. 
>>>          
>>>         Pandora's box is no problem compared to changing pattern rules. 
>>>          
>>> 
>>>         Jon Lowe 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>         -----Original Message----- 
>>>         From: Daniel McLalin <dmclalin at gmail.com> 
>>>         To: nsrca -discussion at lists. nsrca .org 
>>>         Sent: Fri, Jan 1, 2010 5:41 pm 
>>>         Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes 
>>>          
>>>          
>>>         Maybe if the weight limit was raised gas engines would become 
>>> viable for pattern? 
>>>         -- 
>>>         Regards, 
>>>         Daniel McLalin 
>>>         ____________________ 
>>>         Of all the things I ever 
>>> lost....................................... I miss my mind the most! 
>>>          
>>>          www .firehow.com < http :// www .firehow.com/> 
>>>          www .premierbowlers.com < http :// www .premierbowlers.com/> 
>>>          
>>>         _______________________________________________ 
>>>          
>>>          
>>>         NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
>>>          
>>>         NSRCA-discussion at lists. nsrca .org 
>>>          
>>>          http ://lists. nsrca .org/mailman/listinfo/ nsrca -discussion 
>>>          
>>>          
>>>          
>>>         _______________________________________________ 
>>>         NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
>>>         NSRCA-discussion at lists. nsrca .org 
>>>          http ://lists. nsrca .org/mailman/listinfo/ nsrca -discussion 
>>>          
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Regards, 
>>> Daniel McLalin 
>>> ____________________ 
>>> Of all the things I ever 
>>> lost....................................... I miss my mind the most! 
>>> 
>>> www .firehow.com 
>>> www .premierbowlers.com 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ________________________________ 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________ 
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists. nsrca .org 
>>> http ://lists. nsrca .org/mailman/listinfo/ nsrca -discussion 
>>> _______________________________________________ 
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists. nsrca .org 
>>> http ://lists. nsrca .org/mailman/listinfo/ nsrca -discussion 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________ 
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists. nsrca .org 
>> http ://lists. nsrca .org/mailman/listinfo/ nsrca -discussion 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
> NSRCA-discussion at lists. nsrca .org 
> http ://lists. nsrca .org/mailman/listinfo/ nsrca -discussion 
> _______________________________________________ 
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
> NSRCA-discussion at lists. nsrca .org 
> http ://lists. nsrca .org/mailman/listinfo/ nsrca -discussion 

_______________________________________________ 
NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
NSRCA-discussion at lists. nsrca .org 
http ://lists. nsrca .org/mailman/listinfo/ nsrca -discussion 
_______________________________________________ 
NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
NSRCA-discussion at lists. nsrca .org 
http ://lists. nsrca .org/mailman/listinfo/ nsrca -discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20100102/81ecabfd/attachment.html>