<html><head><style type='text/css'>p { margin: 0; }</style></head><body><div style='font-family: Arial; font-size: 12pt; color: #000000'><P>Your sisters must be popular. Never seen a lady in that business.</P>
<P> </P>
<P>Vicente "Vince" Bortone<BR><BR>----- Original Message -----<BR>From: "Mark Atwood" <atwoodm@paragon-inc.com><BR>To: "nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org" <nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org><BR>Sent: Friday, January 1, 2010 10:47:49 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central<BR>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes<BR><BR>Eh, bothof my Sisters are boilermakers so I can't really rag on them. <BR>--------------------------<BR>Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld<BR><BR><BR>----- Original Message -----<BR>From: nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org <nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org><BR>To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org><BR>Sent: Fri Jan 01 23:55:37 2010<BR>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes<BR><BR>Hmmmm. Mark somehow failed to mention Purdue.<BR><BR>Ron<BR><BR>On Jan 1, 2010, at 10:22 PM, Atwood, Mark wrote:<BR><BR>> Hello? That's POISONOUS nut!<BR>><BR>> Wolverines - Breakfast of Champions!!!!<BR>><BR>> GO BUCKS!!<BR>> --------------------------<BR>> Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld<BR>><BR>><BR>> ----- Original Message -----<BR>> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org <nsrca-discussion- <BR>> bounces@lists.nsrca.org><BR>> To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org><BR>> Sent: Fri Jan 01 23:37:29 2010<BR>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes<BR>><BR>> Buckeye - Look in the dictionary. It says " a worthless nut".<BR>><BR>> Ron Van Putte<BR>> BS - Purdue; MS and A&AE - Michigan<BR>><BR>> On Jan 1, 2010, at 8:47 PM, Budd Engineering wrote:<BR>><BR>>> Hey Mark,<BR>>><BR>>> Are those squirrels (the steroid enhanced gray ones) available. I<BR>>> thought they all were playing for the Buckeyes?!!<BR>>><BR>>> : )<BR>>><BR>>> (Happy New Year!!)<BR>>><BR>>> Jerry<BR>>><BR>>> Budd Engineering<BR>>> jerry@buddengineering.com<BR>>> http://www.buddengineering.com<BR>>><BR>>> On Jan 1, 2010, at 6:02 PM, Atwood, Mark wrote:<BR>>><BR>>>> I think we ought to make a weight change to encourage squirril<BR>>>> power. Its "green" with biodegradable emissions, but right now I<BR>>>> can only get adequate power with the heavier bulky steriod<BR>>>> enhanced grey squirrils which make me overweight ...<BR>>>><BR>>>><BR>>>><BR>>>><BR>>>> --------------------------<BR>>>> Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld<BR>>>><BR>>>><BR>>>> ----- Original Message -----<BR>>>> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org <nsrca-discussion-<BR>>>> bounces@lists.nsrca.org><BR>>>> To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org><BR>>>> Sent: Fri Jan 01 20:47:46 2010<BR>>>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes<BR>>>><BR>>>> Making weight with an SAP-180 is easier than with a YS 170 CDI.<BR>>>> The power doesn’t compare, but from a weight perspective, it's no<BR>>>> real issue.<BR>>>><BR>>>> Ed<BR>>>><BR>>>> From: Daniel McLalin <mailto:dmclalin@gmail.com><BR>>>> Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 8:35 PM<BR>>>> To: General pattern discussion <mailto:nsrca-<BR>>>> discussion@lists.nsrca.org><BR>>>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes<BR>>>><BR>>>><BR>>>> John,<BR>>>> <BR>>>><BR>>>> I just happened to read the discussion on RCU about the SAP 140<BR>>>> and it occurred to me that maybe this is why raising the weight<BR>>>> limit should be considered. This does not mean I agree, but just<BR>>>> for thought.<BR>>>><BR>>>> , electrics want a weight break because their fuel tanks are<BR>>>> heavy but their fuel is light; because two strokes aren't<BR>>>> competitive any more we ought to have a high minimum weight for 4-<BR>>>> strokes and electrics to level the playing field; and I want a<BR>>>> weight break because I added 4 oz when I put ignition on my YS's.<BR>>>> <BR>>>> Pandora's box is no problem compared to changing pattern rules.<BR>>>> <BR>>>><BR>>>> Jon Lowe<BR>>>><BR>>>><BR>>>> -----Original Message-----<BR>>>> From: Daniel McLalin <dmclalin@gmail.com><BR>>>> To: nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>>>> Sent: Fri, Jan 1, 2010 5:41 pm<BR>>>> Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes<BR>>>> <BR>>>> <BR>>>> Maybe if the weight limit was raised gas engines would become<BR>>>> viable for pattern?<BR>>>> --<BR>>>> Regards,<BR>>>> Daniel McLalin<BR>>>> ____________________<BR>>>> Of all the things I ever<BR>>>> lost....................................... I miss my mind the most!<BR>>>> <BR>>>> www.firehow.com <http://www.firehow.com/><BR>>>> www.premierbowlers.com <http://www.premierbowlers.com/><BR>>>> <BR>>>> _______________________________________________<BR>>>> <BR>>>> <BR>>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list<BR>>>> <BR>>>> NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>>>> <BR>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<BR>>>> <BR>>>> <BR>>>> <BR>>>> _______________________________________________<BR>>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list<BR>>>> NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<BR>>>> <BR>>>><BR>>>><BR>>>><BR>>>><BR>>>> -- <BR>>>> Regards,<BR>>>> Daniel McLalin<BR>>>> ____________________<BR>>>> Of all the things I ever<BR>>>> lost....................................... I miss my mind the most!<BR>>>><BR>>>> www.firehow.com<BR>>>> www.premierbowlers.com<BR>>>><BR>>>><BR>>>> ________________________________<BR>>>><BR>>>> _______________________________________________<BR>>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list<BR>>>> NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<BR>>>> _______________________________________________<BR>>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list<BR>>>> NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<BR>>><BR>>> _______________________________________________<BR>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list<BR>>> NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<BR>><BR>> _______________________________________________<BR>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list<BR>> NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<BR>> _______________________________________________<BR>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list<BR>> NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion mailing list<BR>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<BR>_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion mailing list<BR>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</P></div></body></html>