[NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes
Atwood, Mark
atwoodm at paragon-inc.com
Fri Jan 1 20:03:07 AKST 2010
Eh, bothof my Sisters are boilermakers so I can't really rag on them.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
----- Original Message -----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org <nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org>
To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Fri Jan 01 23:55:37 2010
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes
Hmmmm. Mark somehow failed to mention Purdue.
Ron
On Jan 1, 2010, at 10:22 PM, Atwood, Mark wrote:
> Hello? That's POISONOUS nut!
>
> Wolverines - Breakfast of Champions!!!!
>
> GO BUCKS!!
> --------------------------
> Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org <nsrca-discussion-
> bounces at lists.nsrca.org>
> To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Sent: Fri Jan 01 23:37:29 2010
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes
>
> Buckeye - Look in the dictionary. It says " a worthless nut".
>
> Ron Van Putte
> BS - Purdue; MS and A&AE - Michigan
>
> On Jan 1, 2010, at 8:47 PM, Budd Engineering wrote:
>
>> Hey Mark,
>>
>> Are those squirrels (the steroid enhanced gray ones) available. I
>> thought they all were playing for the Buckeyes?!!
>>
>> : )
>>
>> (Happy New Year!!)
>>
>> Jerry
>>
>> Budd Engineering
>> jerry at buddengineering.com
>> http://www.buddengineering.com
>>
>> On Jan 1, 2010, at 6:02 PM, Atwood, Mark wrote:
>>
>>> I think we ought to make a weight change to encourage squirril
>>> power. Its "green" with biodegradable emissions, but right now I
>>> can only get adequate power with the heavier bulky steriod
>>> enhanced grey squirrils which make me overweight ...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------
>>> Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org <nsrca-discussion-
>>> bounces at lists.nsrca.org>
>>> To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>>> Sent: Fri Jan 01 20:47:46 2010
>>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes
>>>
>>> Making weight with an SAP-180 is easier than with a YS 170 CDI.
>>> The power doesn’t compare, but from a weight perspective, it's no
>>> real issue.
>>>
>>> Ed
>>>
>>> From: Daniel McLalin <mailto:dmclalin at gmail.com>
>>> Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 8:35 PM
>>> To: General pattern discussion <mailto:nsrca-
>>> discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes
>>>
>>>
>>> John,
>>>
>>>
>>> I just happened to read the discussion on RCU about the SAP 140
>>> and it occurred to me that maybe this is why raising the weight
>>> limit should be considered. This does not mean I agree, but just
>>> for thought.
>>>
>>> , electrics want a weight break because their fuel tanks are
>>> heavy but their fuel is light; because two strokes aren't
>>> competitive any more we ought to have a high minimum weight for 4-
>>> strokes and electrics to level the playing field; and I want a
>>> weight break because I added 4 oz when I put ignition on my YS's.
>>>
>>> Pandora's box is no problem compared to changing pattern rules.
>>>
>>>
>>> Jon Lowe
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Daniel McLalin <dmclalin at gmail.com>
>>> To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>> Sent: Fri, Jan 1, 2010 5:41 pm
>>> Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes
>>>
>>>
>>> Maybe if the weight limit was raised gas engines would become
>>> viable for pattern?
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> Daniel McLalin
>>> ____________________
>>> Of all the things I ever
>>> lost....................................... I miss my mind the most!
>>>
>>> www.firehow.com <http://www.firehow.com/>
>>> www.premierbowlers.com <http://www.premierbowlers.com/>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>>
>>>
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>>
>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>
>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> Daniel McLalin
>>> ____________________
>>> Of all the things I ever
>>> lost....................................... I miss my mind the most!
>>>
>>> www.firehow.com
>>> www.premierbowlers.com
>>>
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list