[NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes

[Budd Engineering]

Hey John, that'd be Frozen Squirrels (it's -5 F in Omaha, supposed to  
get to -15 F by morning)!

It's a balmy 40 here tonight, high for tomorrow is forecast to be 65,  
probably go flying tomorrow.

(now it's time to sit back and wait for Verne to send me his annual  
"bite me" email about the weather...)

: )

Budd Engineering
jerry at buddengineering.com
http://www.buddengineering.com

On Jan 1, 2010, at 7:20 PM, John Gayer wrote:

> Must be some in Lincoln too.
>
> Budd Engineering wrote:
>> Hey Mark,
>>
>> Are those squirrels (the steroid enhanced gray ones) available.  I  
>> thought they all were playing for the Buckeyes?!!
>>
>> : )
>>
>> (Happy New Year!!)
>>
>> Jerry
>>
>> Budd Engineering
>> jerry at buddengineering.com
>> http://www.buddengineering.com
>>
>> On Jan 1, 2010, at 6:02 PM, Atwood, Mark wrote:
>>
>>> I think we ought to make a weight change to encourage squirril  
>>> power.  Its "green" with biodegradable emissions, but right now I  
>>> can only get adequate power with the heavier bulky steriod  
>>> enhanced grey squirrils which make me overweight ...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------
>>> Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org <nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org 
>>> >
>>> To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>>> Sent: Fri Jan 01 20:47:46 2010
>>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes
>>>
>>> Making weight with an SAP-180 is easier than with a YS 170 CDI.   
>>> The power doesn’t compare, but from a weight perspective, it's no  
>>> real issue.
>>>
>>> Ed
>>>
>>> From: Daniel McLalin <mailto:dmclalin at gmail.com>
>>> Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 8:35 PM
>>> To: General pattern discussion <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
>>> >
>>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes
>>>
>>>
>>>        John,
>>>
>>> I just happened to read the discussion on RCU about the SAP 140  
>>> and it occurred to me that maybe this is why raising the weight  
>>> limit should be considered.  This does not mean I agree, but just  
>>> for thought.
>>>
>>>        , electrics want a weight break because their fuel tanks  
>>> are heavy but their fuel is light; because two strokes aren't  
>>> competitive any more we ought to have a high minimum weight for 4- 
>>> strokes and electrics to level the playing field; and I want a  
>>> weight break because I added 4 oz when I put ignition on my YS's.
>>>        Pandora's box is no problem compared to changing pattern  
>>> rules.
>>>
>>>    Jon Lowe
>>>
>>>
>>>    -----Original Message-----
>>>    From: Daniel McLalin <dmclalin at gmail.com>
>>>    To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>    Sent: Fri, Jan 1, 2010 5:41 pm
>>>    Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes
>>>            Maybe if the weight limit was raised gas engines would  
>>> become viable for pattern?
>>>    --
>>>    Regards,
>>>    Daniel McLalin
>>>    ____________________
>>>    Of all the things I ever  
>>> lost....................................... I miss my mind the most!
>>>        www.firehow.com <http://www.firehow.com/>
>>>    www.premierbowlers.com <http://www.premierbowlers.com/>
>>>        _______________________________________________
>>>            NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>>        NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>        http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>                _______________________________________________
>>>    NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>>    NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>    http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Regards,
>>> Daniel McLalin
>>> ____________________
>>> Of all the things I ever  
>>> lost....................................... I miss my mind the most!
>>>
>>> www.firehow.com
>>> www.premierbowlers.com
>>>
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion