[NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes

[Dave]

Nice!!!

OH!!!!

GF and I were quite happy about the game...since she was in the OH band for
5 years.

I really don't think squirrels are going to be the answer, in spite of the
obviously beneficial green effects which would go a long way to combating
all the pollutants put in the air by developing 3rd world industries.
Reason why.....you really don't want the ACLU and PETA in our event checking
on the treatment of the squirrels.

Regards,

Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Budd
Engineering
Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 9:48 PM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes

Hey Mark,

Are those squirrels (the steroid enhanced gray ones) available.  I  
thought they all were playing for the Buckeyes?!!

: )

(Happy New Year!!)

Jerry

Budd Engineering
jerry at buddengineering.com
http://www.buddengineering.com

On Jan 1, 2010, at 6:02 PM, Atwood, Mark wrote:

> I think we ought to make a weight change to encourage squirril  
> power.  Its "green" with biodegradable emissions, but right now I  
> can only get adequate power with the heavier bulky steriod enhanced  
> grey squirrils which make me overweight ...
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------
> Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
<nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org 
> >
> To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Sent: Fri Jan 01 20:47:46 2010
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes
>
> Making weight with an SAP-180 is easier than with a YS 170 CDI.  The  
> power doesn't compare, but from a weight perspective, it's no real  
> issue.
>
> Ed
>
> From: Daniel McLalin <mailto:dmclalin at gmail.com>
> Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 8:35 PM
> To: General pattern discussion <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
> >
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes
>
>
> 		John,
> 	
>
> I just happened to read the discussion on RCU about the SAP 140 and  
> it occurred to me that maybe this is why raising the weight limit  
> should be considered.  This does not mean I agree, but just for  
> thought.
>
> 		, electrics want a weight break because their fuel tanks are
heavy  
> but their fuel is light; because two strokes aren't competitive any  
> more we ought to have a high minimum weight for 4-strokes and  
> electrics to level the playing field; and I want a weight break  
> because I added 4 oz when I put ignition on my YS's.
> 	
> 	Pandora's box is no problem compared to changing pattern rules.
> 	
>
> 	Jon Lowe
>
>
> 	-----Original Message-----
> 	From: Daniel McLalin <dmclalin at gmail.com>
> 	To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> 	Sent: Fri, Jan 1, 2010 5:41 pm
> 	Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes
> 	
> 	
> 	Maybe if the weight limit was raised gas engines would become  
> viable for pattern?
> 	--
> 	Regards,
> 	Daniel McLalin
> 	____________________
> 	Of all the things I ever  
> lost....................................... I miss my mind the most!
> 	
> 	www.firehow.com <http://www.firehow.com/>
> 	www.premierbowlers.com <http://www.premierbowlers.com/>
> 	
> 	_______________________________________________
> 	
> 	
> 	NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> 	
> 	NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> 	
> 	http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 	
> 	
> 	
> 	_______________________________________________
> 	NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> 	NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> 	http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 	
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Regards,
> Daniel McLalin
> ____________________
> Of all the things I ever lost.......................................  
> I miss my mind the most!
>
> www.firehow.com
> www.premierbowlers.com
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion