[NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes

Budd Engineering jerry at buddengineering.com
Fri Jan 1 17:47:41 AKST 2010


Hey Mark,

Are those squirrels (the steroid enhanced gray ones) available.  I  
thought they all were playing for the Buckeyes?!!

: )

(Happy New Year!!)

Jerry

Budd Engineering
jerry at buddengineering.com
http://www.buddengineering.com

On Jan 1, 2010, at 6:02 PM, Atwood, Mark wrote:

> I think we ought to make a weight change to encourage squirril  
> power.  Its "green" with biodegradable emissions, but right now I  
> can only get adequate power with the heavier bulky steriod enhanced  
> grey squirrils which make me overweight ...
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------
> Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org <nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org 
> >
> To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Sent: Fri Jan 01 20:47:46 2010
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes
>
> Making weight with an SAP-180 is easier than with a YS 170 CDI.  The  
> power doesn’t compare, but from a weight perspective, it's no real  
> issue.
>
> Ed
>
> From: Daniel McLalin <mailto:dmclalin at gmail.com>
> Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 8:35 PM
> To: General pattern discussion <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
> >
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes
>
>
> 		John,
> 	
>
> I just happened to read the discussion on RCU about the SAP 140 and  
> it occurred to me that maybe this is why raising the weight limit  
> should be considered.  This does not mean I agree, but just for  
> thought.
>
> 		, electrics want a weight break because their fuel tanks are heavy  
> but their fuel is light; because two strokes aren't competitive any  
> more we ought to have a high minimum weight for 4-strokes and  
> electrics to level the playing field; and I want a weight break  
> because I added 4 oz when I put ignition on my YS's.
> 	
> 	Pandora's box is no problem compared to changing pattern rules.
> 	
>
> 	Jon Lowe
>
>
> 	-----Original Message-----
> 	From: Daniel McLalin <dmclalin at gmail.com>
> 	To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> 	Sent: Fri, Jan 1, 2010 5:41 pm
> 	Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes
> 	
> 	
> 	Maybe if the weight limit was raised gas engines would become  
> viable for pattern?
> 	--
> 	Regards,
> 	Daniel McLalin
> 	____________________
> 	Of all the things I ever  
> lost....................................... I miss my mind the most!
> 	
> 	www.firehow.com <http://www.firehow.com/>
> 	www.premierbowlers.com <http://www.premierbowlers.com/>
> 	
> 	_______________________________________________
> 	
> 	
> 	NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> 	
> 	NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> 	
> 	http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 	
> 	
> 	
> 	_______________________________________________
> 	NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> 	NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> 	http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 	
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Regards,
> Daniel McLalin
> ____________________
> Of all the things I ever lost.......................................  
> I miss my mind the most!
>
> www.firehow.com
> www.premierbowlers.com
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion



More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list