[NSRCA-discussion] FW: weight difference

Robert L. Beaubien rob at koolsoft.com
Tue Aug 24 12:40:44 AKDT 2010


The Focus 2 can be built quite light as well.  I have one with a YS
140DZ and Hatori pipe that weighs 9lbs - 15oz.  Lighter than some of the
Focus 110's out there.  It flies great.  If only I was as good as the
plane is.  J

 

- Robert Beaubien

- NSRCA District 7 Webmaster

-

"No trees were harmed in the sending of this message, however a large
number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced."

 

From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Ed Alt
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 1:35 PM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] FW: weight difference

 

Carl
The Focus II you got from me was about 10.5 lbs with the OS 160 and the
Ric's (heavy metal) pipe.  The Focus ARFs did vary a lot in weight.
Mine/yours was an ARC that was one of the few left with the Piedmont CF
LG, which helped a fair bit with weight.  

You are right, it was a fine flying model.

Ed

________________________________

From: CHV69 at aol.com
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 14:39:15 -0400
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] FW: weight difference




In a message dated 8/24/2010 10:46:15 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
jlachow at hotmail.com writes:

	Funny, I did fly the Focus at one time. It was a great plane in
its day. I had 3 of them.

And I bet they were all under the 11 lb rule.

All of my planes have been under the limit. They all didn't cost
thousands of dollars either.

I started spending more as I became more interested in the sport.

 

A little slack in the lower class is not needed in my opinion.

 

Carl


_______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion mailing
list NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20100824/332bcaa3/attachment.html>


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list