[NSRCA-discussion] unknowns
Ron Van Putte
vanputte at cox.net
Wed Sep 23 10:57:32 AKDT 2009
I smile every time I think about this: The F3A World Championships
host gets a list of potential judges from which to pick. The total
list is predominantly European judges. Most F3A WCs end up with
predominantly European judges. The preponderance of European judges
dictates how judging will be done. However, what if the list of
judges for the 2111 F3A WC is mostly made up of a judge from the
U.S., Canada, Mexico, South Africa, New Zealand, Australia, China,
Japan, Argentina, Venezuela, etc , such that it that it is NOT made
up of predominantly European judges? Who gets to pick the judges?
As the host organization, the NSRCA does.
Ron VP
On Sep 23, 2009, at 1:19 PM, Don Ramsey wrote:
> Matt,
>
> You will be disappointed to know that all the World Judges want to
> have rolling circles. I objected strongly and thought I made a
> good argument; loss of fields, over houses, too much real estate,
> etc. But, they still want the rolling circles in all future
> patterns and especially F patterns. It sure limits the number of
> fields that can fly those patterns unless the pilots decide to roll
> in.
>
> Don
>
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-
> discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of rcmaster199 at aol.com
>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 11:32 AM
> To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] unknowns
>
>
>
> It seems to me that we keep "learning" the same lessons but some
> just never get the memo. Rolling circles are very neat
> differentiating maneuvers BUT not desirable in neither IMAC nor
> Pattern circles. They simply consume too much real estate and
> contradict the very essence of why we in Pattern moved to quiet our
> models. Noise reduction footprint was at the core of that effort
> some 25 years ago.
>
>
>
> As my good friend Dean Pappas and I have discussed on many
> occasions, rolling loops, segments, variations, etc. are just as
> neat as circles and consume no more footprint than the typical
> schedule would. Oh BTW, these are far less difficult to judge
> objectively
>
>
>
> MattK
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ed Alt <ed_alt at hotmail.com>
> To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> Sent: Tue, Sep 22, 2009 10:08 pm
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] unknowns
>
> It's funny. I brought my 40% Carden out of mothballs last weekend
> to work on the F3M stuff and all I wanted to do was fly it like a
> pattern airplane. Ofcourse it doesn't quite measure up, but I
> found that I really have no enthusiasm left for wapping through
> rolls where the only skill involved is being able to stop on time.
> I admit, on the last flight of the day I digressed and did about 10
> minutes of 3d-ish garbage, until I finally realized that it was
> really not very satisfying. Foamies are more fun these days than
> knocking the sticks around on a 40 % gasser. I guess I'm just
> getting old...
>
> Ed
>
> > Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 08:44:06 -0700
> > From: seefo at san.rr.com
> > To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> > Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] unknowns
> >
> > Vince,
> >
> > The "Slow Roll" in IAC does not equate to a pattern slow roll.
> The IAC
> > Slow Roll is just a roll, and the term slow is used to
> differentiate it
> > from a point roll or snap roll. In truth, the IAC slow roll is never
> > flown at anything but maximum roll rate available.
> >
> > -Doug
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yes, partial rolling circles are introduced in the Intermediate
> > > class. As we know, there is not way to do rollers by rolling fast.
> > > IMAC is missing to introduce the slow roll in Sportsman's
> class. I am
> > > not sure why since IAC includes the slow roll.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free. Sign
> up now. =
>
> _______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion
> mailing list NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org http://
> lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list