[NSRCA-discussion] Spectrum and Hobbico... new 2.4 alternatitve

Ed Alt ed_alt at hotmail.com
Wed Sep 23 08:53:39 AKDT 2009


Are you aware of situations where DSM doesn't work?
 


Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:29:59 -0400
From: rcpilot at wowway.com
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Spectrum and Hobbico... new 2.4 alternatitve





I'm still flying 72 MHz using my JR 10X radio.  I need to switch to 2.4 this winter.  This module is the solution to my problem.  I love the 10X, 9303 and 12X radios.  I don't like the DSM2 technology, I feel frequency hopping is a superior technology not to mention you can't use DSM2 in Europe.  Either Europe will eventually approve DSM2 or JR will switch to frequency hopping worldwide.  This solution will afford me more time to see what JR decides to do.  So I plan to try this module out on my foamies and park flyers and if I experience no problems I will use it in my pattern planes come this spring unless JR makes a switch to frequency hopping.  I know there are a lot of people in my situation.

 

Ron
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ed Alt" <ed_alt at hotmail.com>
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 9:58:31 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Spectrum and Hobbico... new 2.4 alternatitve



In all seriousness, I think it makes little sense to cross over brands this way.  FASST, JR, or Airtronics; things work just fine.  I could see the initial idea that Horizon had with Spektrum to get the world moving to Spread Spectrum with their modules, but I think that time has passed us by.  As far as preserving the value of an investment in a transmitter by moving to another brand of receivers with a module - why? Go with a brand you like and don't look back to gimmicks to cross over part way.  You always lose something in the process.
 
Ed
 







Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 07:01:51 -0700
From: bob at toprudder.com
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Spectrum and Hobbico... new 2.4 alternatitve







Personally, I like the FASST system. I must have a dozen 2.4g receivers now. I have nothing against the JR/Spektrum, a lot of my friends fly JR (I am in a very small minority in my club flying Futaba). I will admit that I bought the Spektrum module for one of my old Futaba transmitters, so that I could do the "bind-n-fly" thing as well.
 
I will tell you guys a funny story. I was at Efest this year. I was flying a Vapor over in the corner for the ultralight planes, and heard someone walk up behing a friend of mine (Jeff Phillips, Radioactive Airshow Team) and start asking him how he liked the Vapors. Well, I thought it must be someone who had never flown a Vapor, so I turned around and handed him my transmitter, an old Futaba 7UA with a Spektrum module, so he could fly it. It happened to be Peter Goldsmith. :-)  I wish I had said "feel the difference" to him. 
 
Bob R.


--- On Tue, 9/22/09, John Pavlick <jpavlick at idseng.com> wrote:









Bill,
You are a one-percenter among the one-percenters! LOL 
 
I actually bought the Spektrum module with Rx for my Futaba 12Fg because it was such a good deal. I'm going to use this setup for indoor this year with some of those really small Spektrum receivers. It's also great for the E-Flite Bind-N-Fly models. I just didn't see the point in going "the other way" but I guess in your case it makes sense.
 
John Pavlick




 


Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it now. 
_______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion mailing list NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
Insert movie times and more without leaving Hotmail®.
http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/QuickAdd?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutorial_QuickAdd_062009
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20090923/efdc1f61/attachment.html>


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list