[NSRCA-discussion] unknowns

[Vicente "Vince" Bortone]

Bill, 



Good poing,  I agree 100%.  Thanks, 

Vicente "Vince" Bortone 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill's Email" <wemodels at cox.net> 
To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 12:21:01 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central 
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] unknowns 

What is interesting is at the IAC schools they will stress that some of the best judges are not pilots at all. In models we fall into this idea that the higher class you fly the better judge you are and honestly I have not really seen that to be the case. I have seen some uper class pilots who were terrible judges and who barely know the actual criteria. And I have seen lower class pilots who actually know the criteria who make great judges. 



Vicente "Vince" Bortone wrote: 





Bill, 



I am sorry that we don't agree.  I just reading what is written in the rule book.  With your credentials you should be able to explain what is in the rule book.  We have the problem that we first wear the pilot hat and forget that it is more important to wear the judge hat.  Judges have the main responsibility to follow what is in the rule book and use it to make the playing field equal for all pilots.  I recognize that it is very difficult task.  



Best regards,  

Vicente "Vince" Bortone 


_______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion mailing list NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20090923/c0f1cef5/attachment.html>