[NSRCA-discussion] Speaking of the 2011 Worlds at Muncie . . . . .

[Anthony Frackowiak]

Practice fields near the site will be a problem at least until the  
finals day. In the semi-finals you will have thirty or so WC fliers  
wanting to get in practice on that day off before the semi's are  
flown. Even worse will be trying to get a motel room before the WC's  
end.

I still don't see why September is not better. I just looked at the  
AMA site schedule for this month this year and there is very little  
going on. If held in September you could probably have several  
practice sites right at AMA.

Tony


On Sep 2, 2009, at 6:07 PM, krishlan fitzsimmons wrote:

> Derek,
>
> I think it's a GREAT idea to have them in the order that you are  
> submitting them. It is the only way I could attend both. I will  
> attend the nats if it is done this way. If not, probably just the  
> worlds. I can go to the nats any year, but not the worlds. Will be a  
> new "learning" experience for me getting to watch how the best of  
> all countries fly their sequences, and should make me a better pilot  
> IMO.
>
> If I can't fly by the time I get to the nats, I won't learn it at  
> the practice field anyway. Plus, we still will have our practice  
> fields from Thursday on of the previous week (which is no different  
> than any year), which is when some of us get there. Most I think get  
> there on Saturday or Sunday. Not sure why some think it's a problem  
> with practice fields.
>
> I can see the school part of this being an issue for some of the  
> younger competitors, but my daughter started school a few weeks ago,  
> attended the first week, then we were on vacation for the second  
> week, she was back the third week. It wasn't a problem at all.
>
>  Thanks for putting this together so that we can host the world  
> championship! I can't hardly wait to go!
>
>
> Chris
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Derek Koopowitz <derekkoopowitz at gmail.com>
> To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 2, 2009 4:44:07 PM
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Speaking of the 2011 Worlds at  
> Muncie . . . . .
>
> Fluid meaning that the dates could move a few days forward or  
> backward... yes, absolutely.
>
> Cast in concrete - when the 1st bulletin gets mailed out.
>
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Anthony Frackowiak <frackowiak at sbcglobal.net 
> > wrote:
> No it has not been worked out. You are saying your dates for the WC  
> are fluid, and the dates for the 2011 Nats are not set even  
> tentatively. So there is a lot in the air.
>
> Tony
>
> On Sep 2, 2009, at 4:15 PM, Derek Koopowitz wrote:
>
>> Actually it had been all worked out until "everyone" started  
>> chiming in as to their preference for when the wc should be held  
>> and the Nats should be held... can't please all the people.
>>
>> LOL
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Anthony Frackowiak <frackowiak at sbcglobal.net 
>> > wrote:
>> I absolutely agree. IRCHA will not move their dates unless forced  
>> to by the AMA. And I doubt the AMA will do so.
>>
>> I find it hard to believe that this has not been worked out yet.
>>
>> Tony
>>
>> On Sep 2, 2009, at 4:00 PM, Bill's Email wrote:
>>
>>> Anthony Frackowiak wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Archie is absolutely correct.
>>>>
>>>> Tony
>>>>
>>>> On Sep 2, 2009, at 3:51 PM, Archie Stafford wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> IRCHA is a totally different animal though.  Kind of like having  
>>>>> Joe Nall after the pattern worlds.  I’d say most people really  
>>>>> didn’t care about the F3C worlds.  IRCHA does a lot more 3D stuff.
>>>
>>>
>>> And my point was that attracting 900 paid participants to an event  
>>> is going to give them some clout when it comes to a schedule  
>>> relative to the pattern NATS. The WC are a different thing, but  
>>> IRCHA is not likely to budge for the pattern NATS if it came to  
>>> that.
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20090903/223c1559/attachment.html>