[NSRCA-discussion] Speaking of the 2011 Worlds at Muncie . . . . .

[Anthony Frackowiak]

Derek,

Maybe I'm coming in late to this discussion, and for that I apologize.  
But I would like to ask a few more questions just for clarification.

You have stated before that the Pattern Nats for 2011 won't be  
scheduled until October of 2010. Has there been any serious discussion  
with the AMA about the 2011 Pattern Nats and if it will even be  
possible to do what you are stating? Can they can even be held after  
the WC? It would seem that this will take a monumental shift in the  
Center schedule.

Are the dates that you have put out for the WC's the only alternative  
right now? Do we even have the option of moving them later?

Thanks for your reply!

Tony


On Sep 2, 2009, at 4:44 PM, Derek Koopowitz wrote:

> Fluid meaning that the dates could move a few days forward or  
> backward... yes, absolutely.
>
> Cast in concrete - when the 1st bulletin gets mailed out.
>
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Anthony Frackowiak <frackowiak at sbcglobal.net 
> > wrote:
> No it has not been worked out. You are saying your dates for the WC  
> are fluid, and the dates for the 2011 Nats are not set even  
> tentatively. So there is a lot in the air.
>
> Tony
>
> On Sep 2, 2009, at 4:15 PM, Derek Koopowitz wrote:
>
>> Actually it had been all worked out until "everyone" started  
>> chiming in as to their preference for when the wc should be held  
>> and the Nats should be held... can't please all the people.
>>
>> LOL
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Anthony Frackowiak <frackowiak at sbcglobal.net 
>> > wrote:
>> I absolutely agree. IRCHA will not move their dates unless forced  
>> to by the AMA. And I doubt the AMA will do so.
>>
>> I find it hard to believe that this has not been worked out yet.
>>
>> Tony
>>
>> On Sep 2, 2009, at 4:00 PM, Bill's Email wrote:
>>
>>> Anthony Frackowiak wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Archie is absolutely correct.
>>>>
>>>> Tony
>>>>
>>>> On Sep 2, 2009, at 3:51 PM, Archie Stafford wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> IRCHA is a totally different animal though.  Kind of like having  
>>>>> Joe Nall after the pattern worlds.  I’d say most people really  
>>>>> didn’t care about the F3C worlds.  IRCHA does a lot more 3D stuff.
>>>
>>>
>>> And my point was that attracting 900 paid participants to an event  
>>> is going to give them some clout when it comes to a schedule  
>>> relative to the pattern NATS. The WC are a different thing, but  
>>> IRCHA is not likely to budge for the pattern NATS if it came to  
>>> that.
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20090903/bbe92532/attachment.html>