[NSRCA-discussion] Speaking of the 2011 Worlds at Muncie . . . . .

[krishlan fitzsimmons]

Derek, 

I think it's a GREAT idea to have them in the order that you are submitting them. It is the only way I could attend both. I will attend the nats if it is done this way. If not, probably just the worlds. I can go to the nats any year, but not the worlds. Will be a new "learning" experience for me getting to watch how the best of all countries fly their sequences, and should make me a better pilot IMO. 

If I can't fly by the time I get to the nats, I won't learn it at the practice field anyway. Plus, we still will have our practice fields from Thursday on of the previous week (which is no different than any year), which is when some of us get there. Most I think get there on Saturday or Sunday. Not sure why some think it's a problem with practice fields. 

I can see the school part of this being an issue for some of the younger competitors, but my daughter started school a few weeks ago, attended the first week, then we were on vacation for the second week, she was back the third week. It wasn't a problem at all. 


 Thanks for putting this together so that we can host the world championship! I can't hardly wait to go! 



Chris 
 
 
 




________________________________
From: Derek Koopowitz <derekkoopowitz at gmail.com>
To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 2, 2009 4:44:07 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Speaking of the 2011 Worlds at Muncie . . . . .


Fluid meaning that the dates could move a few days forward or backward... yes, absolutely.
 
Cast in concrete - when the 1st bulletin gets mailed out.


On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Anthony Frackowiak <frackowiak at sbcglobal.net> wrote:

No it has not been worked out. You are saying your dates for the WC are fluid, and the dates for the 2011 Nats are not set even tentatively. So there is a lot in the air. 
>
>
>
>Tony
>
>
>On Sep 2, 2009, at 4:15 PM, Derek Koopowitz wrote:
>
>Actually it had been all worked out until "everyone" started chiming in as to their preference for when the wc should be held and the Nats should be held... can't please all the people.
>> 
>>LOL
>>
>>
>>On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Anthony Frackowiak <frackowiak at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>
>>I absolutely agree. IRCHA will not move their dates unless forced to by the AMA. And I doubt the AMA will do so. 
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>I find it hard to believe that this has not been worked out yet. 
>>>
>>>
>>>Tony
>>>
>>>
>>>On Sep 2, 2009, at 4:00 PM, Bill's Email wrote:
>>>
>>>Anthony Frackowiak wrote: 
>>>>
>>>>Archie is absolutely correct.  
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Tony
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>On Sep 2, 2009, at 3:51 PM, Archie Stafford wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>IRCHA is a totally different animal though.  Kind of like having Joe Nall after the pattern worlds.  I’d say most people really didn’t care about the F3C worlds.  IRCHA does a lot more 3D stuff.   
>>>>
>>>>And my point was that attracting 900 paid participants to an event is going to give them some clout when it comes to a schedule relative to the pattern NATS. The WC are a different thing, but IRCHA is not likely to budge for the pattern NATS if it came to that.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>>>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>_______________________________________________
>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>



      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20090903/b231343c/attachment.html>