[NSRCA-discussion] Channel assignments on Futaba 2.4GHz

[James Oddino]

Thanks to all.  It seemed logical to leave things the way they were  
unless there was some significant performance improvement.

Jim


On Oct 27, 2009, at 8:56 AM, AtwoodDon at aol.com wrote:

> Jim, I usually just use the 'suggested' ports because the 14MZ  
> automatically sets up linked functions like elev and ail for any  
> mixing and you don't have to do any linking, etc.
>
> Both ways work just fine, just easier to go with the suggested ports  
> on a new setup.
>
> Don
>
> In a message dated 10/27/2009 8:48:08 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, jim.woodward at baesystems.com 
>  writes:
> Jim - that is also useful information for "ganging" servos together  
> on IMAC planes.  As for a real world noticeable difference, I cannot  
> detect it.
> Thanks,
> Jim W.
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca- 
> discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of James Oddino
> Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 11:42 AM
> To: discussion pattern General
> Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Channel assignments on Futaba 2.4GHz
>
> I've been flying with my 14MZ on six meters and am now changing over
> to 2.4 GHz.  I've had the ailerons on channels 4 and 5 but I notice
> the 2.4 instructions suggest there is an optimum assignment as
> channels 1-4 and 5-8 are sent in different packets.
>
> I assume this is something the helicopter guys worry about but is
> insignificant for us.  What is everyone doing?
>
> Jim
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20091027/1a918cfd/attachment.html>