<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">Thanks to all. It seemed logical to leave things the way they were unless there was some significant performance improvement.<div><br></div><div>Jim</div><div><br></div><div><br><div><div>On Oct 27, 2009, at 8:56 AM, <a href="mailto:AtwoodDon@aol.com">AtwoodDon@aol.com</a> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite">
<div style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial; COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE: 10pt" id="role_body" bottommargin="7" leftmargin="7" rightmargin="7" topmargin="7"><font id="role_document" color="#000000" size="2" face="Arial">
<div>Jim, I usually just use the 'suggested' ports because the 14MZ
automatically sets up linked functions like elev and ail for any mixing and you
don't have to do any linking, etc.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Both ways work just fine, just easier to go with the suggested ports on a
new setup.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Don</div>
<div> </div>
<div>
<div>In a message dated 10/27/2009 8:48:08 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
<a href="mailto:jim.woodward@baesystems.com">jim.woodward@baesystems.com</a> writes:</div>
<blockquote style="BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px"><font style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" color="#000000" size="2" face="Arial">Jim -
that is also useful information for "ganging" servos together on IMAC
planes. As for a real world noticeable difference, I cannot detect
it.<br>Thanks,<br>Jim W.<br><br><br><br><br>-----Original
Message-----<br>From: <a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org</a>
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of James
Oddino<br>Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 11:42 AM<br>To: discussion pattern
General<br>Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Channel assignments on Futaba
2.4GHz<br><br>I've been flying with my 14MZ on six meters and am now changing
over <br>to 2.4 GHz. I've had the ailerons on channels 4 and 5 but
I notice <br>the 2.4 instructions suggest there is an optimum assignment
as <br>channels 1-4 and 5-8 are sent in different packets.<br><br>I
assume this is something the helicopter guys worry about but is
<br>insignificant for us. What is everyone
doing?<br><br>Jim<br>_______________________________________________<br>NSRCA-discussion
mailing
list<br><a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<br>_______________________________________________<br>NSRCA-discussion
mailing
list<br>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<br>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<br></font></blockquote></div></font></div>
_______________________________________________<br>NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br><a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>