[NSRCA-discussion] Channel assignments on Futaba 2.4GHz
AtwoodDon at aol.com
AtwoodDon at aol.com
Tue Oct 27 07:56:35 AKDT 2009
Jim, I usually just use the 'suggested' ports because the 14MZ
automatically sets up linked functions like elev and ail for any mixing and you don't
have to do any linking, etc.
Both ways work just fine, just easier to go with the suggested ports on a
new setup.
Don
In a message dated 10/27/2009 8:48:08 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
jim.woodward at baesystems.com writes:
Jim - that is also useful information for "ganging" servos together on
IMAC planes. As for a real world noticeable difference, I cannot detect it.
Thanks,
Jim W.
-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of James Oddino
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 11:42 AM
To: discussion pattern General
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Channel assignments on Futaba 2.4GHz
I've been flying with my 14MZ on six meters and am now changing over
to 2.4 GHz. I've had the ailerons on channels 4 and 5 but I notice
the 2.4 instructions suggest there is an optimum assignment as
channels 1-4 and 5-8 are sent in different packets.
I assume this is something the helicopter guys worry about but is
insignificant for us. What is everyone doing?
Jim
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20091027/621befa9/attachment.html>
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list