[NSRCA-discussion] Proposed rule change

[ronlock at comcast.net]

Yes, I agree on making all the stall turn descriptions consistent, and match the stall turn description as you note below. 

Ron Lockhart 
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bob Richards" <bob at toprudder.com> 
To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 
Sent: Sunday, October 11, 2009 5:11:02 PM (GMT-0500) Auto-Detected 
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Proposed rule change 


--- On Sun, 10/11/09, ronlock at comcast.net <ronlock at comcast.net> wrote: 




I'd prefer the descriptions be left as is, and accept that at some amount of wind, a 10 may not be possible. 


I say the judging criteria should be the same for the stall turn element(s) in all maneuvers that contain stall turns. At present, the descriptions are inconsistent. At least change the Figure M and Double Stall turn descriptions to match the Stall Turn w/ or w/o rolls, from "model must be vertical" to "model track must be vertical". Can we agree on that? 
_______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion mailing list NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20091011/768ca317/attachment.html>