[NSRCA-discussion] Proposed rule change

[Bob Richards]

--- On Sun, 10/11/09, ronlock at comcast.net <ronlock at comcast.net> wrote:



I'd prefer the descriptions be left as is, and accept that at some amount of wind, a 10 may not be possible.

#yiv1381357132 p {margin:0;}

 
I say the judging criteria should be the same for the stall turn element(s) in all maneuvers that contain stall turns. At present, the descriptions are inconsistent. At least change the Figure M and Double Stall turn descriptions to match the Stall Turn w/ or w/o rolls, from "model must be vertical" to "model track must be vertical". Can we agree on that?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20091011/c9f92caf/attachment.html>