<html><head><style type='text/css'>p { margin: 0; }</style></head><body><div style='font-family: Arial; font-size: 12pt; color: #000000'>Yes, I agree on making all the stall turn descriptions consistent, and match the stall turn description as you note below.<br><br>Ron Lockhart<br>----- Original Message -----<br>From: "Bob Richards" <bob@toprudder.com><br>To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org><br>Sent: Sunday, October 11, 2009 5:11:02 PM (GMT-0500) Auto-Detected<br>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Proposed rule change<br><br><table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td style="font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; font-size: inherit; line-height: inherit; font-size-adjust: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; -x-system-font: none;" valign="top"><br>--- On <b>Sun, 10/11/09, ronlock@comcast.net <i><ronlock@comcast.net></i></b> wrote:<br>
<blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); padding-left: 5px; margin-left: 5px;"><br>
<div id="yiv1381357132">I'd prefer the descriptions be left as is, and accept that at some amount of wind, a 10 may not be possible.<br>
<style>#yiv1381357132 p {margin:0;}</style>
</div>
<div> </div></blockquote>
<div>I say the judging criteria should be the same for the stall turn element(s) in all maneuvers that contain stall turns. At present, the descriptions are inconsistent. At least change the Figure M and Double Stall turn descriptions to match the Stall Turn w/ or w/o rolls, from "model must be vertical" to "model track must be vertical". Can we agree on that?</div></td></tr></tbody></table><br>_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</div></body></html>