[NSRCA-discussion] basic judging question (warning 4 letter word)

[Bob Richards]

Interesting idea.

--- On Sun, 10/11/09, ronlock at comcast.net <ronlock at comcast.net> wrote:




#yiv717227803 p {margin:0;}

How about changing not the judging criteria for the snap,  but provide a maximum downgrade for
the snap element of the maneuver that is very low, say two?.

So an avalanche that does not show a pitch break to initiate the snap, receives at most a two point downgrade for the snap portion, and whatever other downgrades the loop portion gets ( constant radius, centered, etc)

Ron Lockhart

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Richards" <bob at toprudder.com>
To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Saturday, October 10, 2009 9:09:10 PM (GMT-0500) Auto-Detected
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] basic judging question (warning 4 letter word)





I think changing the judging criteria, just for the snap part of the manuever, would suffice.

--- On Sat, 10/10/09, John Ferrell <jferrell13 at triad.rr.com> wrote:



 
#yiv717227803 #yiv1062628926 P {
MARGIN:0px;}


I believe "We could fix most of that, by assigning a low K to snap maneuvers" is the only appropriate solution. If you cast them out, it is giving up. 
 
John Ferrell  W8CCW
 

_______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion mailing list NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----


_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20091011/211f0570/attachment.html>