[NSRCA-discussion] Not bama now

[Phil Spelt]

Dave, you're listening to the wrong "they"...

At 09:44 PM 11/25/2009, you wrote:
>Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>         boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00C9_01CA6E18.75511900"
>Content-Language: en-us
>
>Now I'm a little confused.
>I thought SPA didn't like the 16" prop on my Phoenix V at the 
>Asheville contest because "they" thought there was a performance 
>advantage. Now I find "they" just didn't like the looks of it?
>Oh well!
>Dave Burton
>
>From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org 
>[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of scott anderson
>Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 9:32 PM
>To: General pattern discussion
>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Not bama now
>
>The 13 inch prop is what is currently being used in the KV range of 
>the motors being used in either the 5S or 6S range.. we have all the 
>data from the Chattanooga spa contest... And since a 16 inch prop 
>showed up at a contest the plane looked like a cartoon...
>
>scott
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <mailto:chuenkan at comcast.net>Phil Spelt
>To: <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>General pattern discussion
>Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 9:27 PM
>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Not bama now
>
>Jerry, my comments were NOT meant for you -- no apology necessary!
>
>There are several pieces of miss-information floating around in 
>cyberspace about our new SPA e-rules.  The attempt is to make 
>electrics comparable to our glow powered planes.  The "13-inch" rule 
>is not correct, and as someone pointed out, specifying cell number 
>and prop size leaves the e-power field wide open.  That is not what 
>we will be doing for this year.  What we will soon have in place is 
>for the upcoming season, only.  If it does not work to our 
>satisfaction, there is a majority, as I read things, ready to chop 
>off the e-head of the e-power sector of the hobby.  We have pretty 
>well determined that there were NO electric pattern planes in our 
>chosen era of flying.
>
>At 08:26 PM 11/25/2009, you wrote:
>
>Phil,
>
>I am sorry if I came across as complaining about the rules, i meant 
>nothing of the sort.  I was just puzzled by the 13" prop rule for electric.
>
>Jerry
>_______________________________________________
>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
><http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>--> There are only two types of aircraft -- fighters and targets.
>
>Phil Spelt, Past President, Knox County Radio Control Society, Inc.
>        URL: <http://www.kcrctn.com/>http://www.kcrctn.com
>AMA--1294,  Scientific Leader Member, SPA--177
>       My URL: 
> <http://mywebpages.comcast.net/~chuenkan/>http://mywebpages.comcast.net/~chuenkan/
>       (865) 435-1476 v  (865) 604-0541 c
>
>----------
>_______________________________________________
>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>_______________________________________________
>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-->There are only two types of aircraft -- fighters and targets.

Phil Spelt, Past President, Knox County Radio Control Society, Inc.
        URL: http://www.kcrctn.com
AMA--1294,  Scientific Leader Member, SPA--177
       My URL: http://mywebpages.comcast.net/~chuenkan/
       (865) 435-1476 v  (865) 604-0541 c  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20091126/d3a86bef/attachment.html>