[NSRCA-discussion] Not bama now

Bill Glaze billglaze at bellsouth.net
Thu Nov 26 06:10:47 AKST 2009


Dave:
Caught by those "flexible" rules?  Bill
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Dave Burton 
  To: 'General pattern discussion' 
  Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 9:44 PM
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Not bama now


  Now I'm a little confused.

  I thought SPA didn't like the 16" prop on my Phoenix V at the Asheville contest because "they" thought there was a performance advantage. Now I find "they" just didn't like the looks of it?

  Oh well!

  Dave Burton

   

  From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of scott anderson
  Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 9:32 PM
  To: General pattern discussion
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Not bama now

   

  The 13 inch prop is what is currently being used in the KV range of the motors being used in either the 5S or 6S range.. we have all the data from the Chattanooga spa contest... And since a 16 inch prop showed up at a contest the plane looked like a cartoon...

   

  scott

    ----- Original Message ----- 

    From: Phil Spelt 

    To: General pattern discussion 

    Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 9:27 PM

    Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Not bama now

     

    Jerry, my comments were NOT meant for you -- no apology necessary!  

    There are several pieces of miss-information floating around in cyberspace about our new SPA e-rules.  The attempt is to make electrics comparable to our glow powered planes.  The "13-inch" rule is not correct, and as someone pointed out, specifying cell number and prop size leaves the e-power field wide open.  That is not what we will be doing for this year.  What we will soon have in place is for the upcoming season, only.  If it does not work to our satisfaction, there is a majority, as I read things, ready to chop off the e-head of the e-power sector of the hobby.  We have pretty well determined that there were NO electric pattern planes in our chosen era of flying.

    At 08:26 PM 11/25/2009, you wrote:



    Phil,
     
    I am sorry if I came across as complaining about the rules, i meant nothing of the sort.  I was just puzzled by the 13" prop rule for electric.
     
    Jerry
    _______________________________________________
    NSRCA-discussion mailing list
    NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
    http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

    --> There are only two types of aircraft -- fighters and targets.

    Phil Spelt, Past President, Knox County Radio Control Society, Inc.
           URL: http://www.kcrctn.com
    AMA--1294,  Scientific Leader Member, SPA--177
          My URL: http://mywebpages.comcast.net/~chuenkan/
          (865) 435-1476 v  (865) 604-0541 c 


----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    _______________________________________________
    NSRCA-discussion mailing list
    NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
    http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20091126/a7957eb3/attachment.html>


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list