[NSRCA-discussion] Another Poll Regarding Masters on RCU

[Verne Koester]

Actually, the place it would help the most is at the Nats, particularly on
an un-scored landing where the judges could stop judging immediately
following the last maneuver before landing and use that time to tabulate
their scoresheets and start getting ready for the next pilot. The minutes
saved there would add up quickly over the twenty or so pilots a Masters
judge has to judge. The Nats is the one place where the CD doesn't have the
discretion to drop maneuvers because the rulebook has to be followed. We'd
have to legislate it out if we wanted it to happen.

 

Verne Koester

 

From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of J N Hiller
Sent: Monday, May 11, 2009 11:30 AM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Another Poll Regarding Masters on RCU

 

CD elective!

Jim Hiller

 

-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Joe Lachowski
Sent: Monday, May 11, 2009 7:34 AM
To: NSRCA Discussion List
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Another Poll Regarding Masters on RCU

 

I have put up another poll on RCU regarding Masters. Should we eliminate
scoring Takeoffs and Landings in Masters? Masters only of course. Logic
being it might help some in moving things along during a contest and at this
level it really  shouldn't be a determining factor in the final outcome of a
contest. How much it helps, who knows. 
 
The other poll regarding sequence length is debatable. It was for all
practical purposes about 50/50 when it came to length of the sequence. To me
60% or more one way or the other would make it conclusive which way we
should go.
 
Ducking<g>

  _____  

Insert movie times and more without leaving HotmailR. See how.
<http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/QuickAdd?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutor
ial_QuickAdd1_052009> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20090512/64bc1a13/attachment.html>