[NSRCA-discussion] Length of 2011 Masters Sequence

[Archie Stafford]

I think there is a big difference between a loop with a roll at the top and
a truly integrated rolling maneuver where you are constantly rolling such as
a 1 roll loop or 2 roll loop.  A 4 point at the top is no different than an
avalanche. If you classify that loop with a 4 point at the top as integrated
then you would also have to classify the avalanche as an integrated rolling
maneuver, but with a snap at the top.  

 

From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Joe Lachowski
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 12:21 PM
To: NSRCA Discussion List
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Length of 2011 Masters Sequence

 

And one of the design criteria we have been going by over the last two
cycles is that Masters is not to have rolling circles or integrated rollers.
That is the big separator between the two classes. I'm with you on this
point Bob and Ron.
 
> Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 07:27:21 -0700
> From: getterflash at yahoo.com
> To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Length of 2011 Masters Sequence
> 
> 
> I'm with you on this one . . . There might have been a time when the
Masters and FAI schedules were interchangeable, but not anymore. For me
personally it is the rolling circles or loops that would knock me out. I
have enough trouble making straight rolls look good. 
> 
> Bob Kane
> getterflash at yahoo.com
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Ron Van Putte <vanputte at cox.net>
> To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2009 10:15:53 AM
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Length of 2011 Masters Sequence
> 
> Let me post a dissenting input. If the Master class pilots were "plenty
good enough" to fly the FAI P maneuver schedule, we'd be in FAI. I have no
desire to fly the FAI P or any other FAI sequence that is selected by anyone
else but pilots in the U.S. The Master class is the U.S. destination class.
Leave FAI and its maneuver schedules to those who want to compete on the
international level.
> 
> Rant over.
> 
> Ron
> 
> On May 5, 2009, at 9:02 AM, michael s harrison wrote:
> 
> > Joe,
> > 
> > It has probably been mentioned before but I would recommend simply using
the existing-whatever is at that time- FAI P pattern for the masters
sequence and allow it to be replaced by the upcoming P pattern every cycle.
The pilots are plenty good enough and it would really simplify things and
put everyone on the same page. I believe it would be exciting and fun.
> > 
> > Mike
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Joe Lachowski
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 8:05 AM
> > To: NSRCA Discussion List
> > Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Length of 2011 Masters Sequence
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > There has been some discussion on whether it is time to shorten the
length of the Masters sequence for 2011. A Poll has been set up on RCU to
get the current crop of Masters pilots and future Masters pilots opinions.
> > 
> > http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_8742141/tm.htm
> > 
> > Windows LiveT: Keep your life in sync. Check it out.
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

  _____  

Insert movie times and more without leaving HotmailR. See how.
<http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/QuickAdd?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutor
ial_QuickAdd1_052009> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20090505/24f1070a/attachment.html>