[NSRCA-discussion] Length of 2011 Masters Sequence
mike mueller
mups1953 at yahoo.com
Tue May 5 07:31:16 AKDT 2009
The current pattern puts E. guys at a bit of a disadvantage. It pushes my setup a little further than I prefer. It is a great pattern and I compliment the designers for having a nice flow. Mike
--- On Tue, 5/5/09, verne at twmi.rr.com <verne at twmi.rr.com> wrote:
> From: verne at twmi.rr.com <verne at twmi.rr.com>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Length of 2011 Masters Sequence
> To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Date: Tuesday, May 5, 2009, 10:24 AM
> If it sounded as though I were complaining that the current
> Masters schedule takes too long, I wasn't. Just
> commenting that it takes a lot longer than the previous one.
> For me, eight minutes from takeoff to landing approach (my
> timer is started on takeoff and is almost always beeping
> during my landing). I fly at what I would call a medium
> speed most of the time.
>
> I'm also against flying the FAI-P schedule. I'd
> rather fly a home-grown variant that we create ourselves.
>
> Verne Koester
>
>
> ---- Stuart Chale <schale at optonline.net> wrote:
> > _______________________________________________
> > NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> >
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list