[NSRCA-discussion] Length of 2011 Masters Sequence

[Archie Stafford]

Verne,

This started when I suggested to the sequence committee that we need to
shorten the masters pattern.  Flying it is fine, but I think we need to take
into account the guys who have to sit and judge it.  I heard several guys in
FAI judging this weekend about how long a sequence it is.  Which wouldn't be
near as bad except for the fact Masters is usually the largest class at most
contests.  I think we need to consider the length of time in the judges
chair for those that have to judge it as well.

Arch


-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of mike mueller
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 10:31 AM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Length of 2011 Masters Sequence


 The current pattern puts E. guys at a bit of a disadvantage. It pushes my
setup a little further than I prefer. It is a great pattern and I compliment
the designers for having a nice flow. Mike


--- On Tue, 5/5/09, verne at twmi.rr.com <verne at twmi.rr.com> wrote:

> From: verne at twmi.rr.com <verne at twmi.rr.com>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Length of 2011 Masters Sequence
> To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Date: Tuesday, May 5, 2009, 10:24 AM
> If it sounded as though I were complaining that the current
> Masters schedule takes too long, I wasn't. Just
> commenting that it takes a lot longer than the previous one.
> For me, eight minutes from takeoff to landing approach (my
> timer is started on takeoff and is almost always beeping
> during my landing). I fly at what I would call a medium
> speed most of the time. 
> 
> I'm also against flying the FAI-P schedule. I'd
> rather fly a home-grown variant that we create ourselves.
> 
> Verne Koester
> 
> 
> ---- Stuart Chale <schale at optonline.net> wrote: 
> > _______________________________________________
> > NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> >
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


      
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion