[NSRCA-discussion] Fwd: New fast charge battery
George W.Kennie
geobet4 at verizon.net
Fri Mar 20 08:11:29 AKDT 2009
It must take an awful lot of current ! I charged a pak once at 5C and when the charger indicated "Charge Done" the pak was like an Ice cube. There is even a battery vendor now that is recommending 5C charge rates.
Take an old pak and experiment and see how far you need to go to generate excessive heat. I don't know if it's going to happen?
G.
----- Original Message -----
From: James Oddino
To: General pattern discussion
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 1:00 AM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Fwd: New fast charge battery
I don't know for sure but I would guess it depends on how much heat is generated. With lower internal resistance it could be a push (10C on the new batteries might be equivalent to 1C on our present state of the art packs).
Jim
On Mar 19, 2009, at 6:54 PM, Dave wrote:
The faster you charge, the fewer the cycles you get!! Figure cycle life is reduced by about 50% at 3C charge rates.
Regards,
Dave
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Stuart Chale
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 6:48 PM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Fwd: New fast charge battery
The key in my mind as we already have enough power in a makable weight for a new set of batteries, is the number of cycles you can get. It the new technology gets us 200 cycles before degradation then I'll take 2 :) Don't need three any more because they charge faster.
Stuart
Ed Alt wrote:
This is very straightforward. The ideal battery is one that has 0 ohms internal resistance and infinite current delivery capability. This new technology gets you somewhat closer to that ideal. All it means is that it minimizes power losses due to much lower internal resistance, and reduces limitations that are placed on the performance of the thing you are powering with it. Even the ideal battery can only deliver as much current into the load as that device will draw based on its own resistance (actually impedance, but we'll keep it simple) Doesn't matter whether it is a motor, a light bulb or whatever. It's all good...
Ed
----- Original Message -----
From: Keith Hoard
To: General pattern discussion
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 5:15 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Fwd: New fast charge battery
How good would these batteries work in my glow starter?. . .
2009/3/19 Ed Alt <ed_alt at hotmail.com>
No way! That is simply evidence that your paint needs to be upgraded!
----- Original Message -----
From: Rex
To: NSRCA-discussion
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 4:33 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Fwd: New fast charge battery
Now I'm just guessing here.... I'm thinking that if you throttle up and the paint
strips off the fuse, that's probably a bit too much!
Rex
------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: joddino at socal.rr.com
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:10:06 -0700
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Fwd: New fast charge battery
I used to say that an engine is a machine that doesn't make enough power. Now I say a motor is also a machine that doesn't make enough power.
Jim
On Mar 19, 2009, at 8:29 AM, J N Hiller wrote:
Hay Rex how much power do you need? You can do a vertical ROG now.
Jim
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
--
Keith Hoard
Collierville, TN
khoard at gmail.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________NSRCA-discussion mailing listNSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.orghttp://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion _______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
--
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter.
We are a community of 6 million users fighting spam.
SPAMfighter has removed 25178 of my spam emails to date.
Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len
The Professional version does not have this message
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20090320/cd58a81c/attachment.html>
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list