[NSRCA-discussion] Fwd: New fast charge battery

[James Oddino]

I don't know for sure but I would guess it depends on how much heat is  
generated.  With lower internal resistance it could be a push (10C on  
the new batteries might be equivalent to 1C on our present state of  
the art packs).

Jim

On Mar 19, 2009, at 6:54 PM, Dave wrote:

> The faster you charge, the fewer the cycles you get!!  Figure cycle  
> life is reduced by about 50% at 3C charge rates.
>
> Regards,
>
> Dave
>
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org 
> ] On Behalf Of Stuart Chale
> Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 6:48 PM
> To: General pattern discussion
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Fwd: New fast charge battery
>
> The key in my mind as we already have enough power in a makable  
> weight for a new set of batteries, is the number of cycles you can  
> get.  It the new technology gets us 200 cycles before degradation  
> then I'll take 2 :)  Don't need three any more because they charge  
> faster.
> Stuart
>
> Ed Alt wrote:
> This is very straightforward.  The ideal battery is one that has 0  
> ohms internal resistance and infinite current delivery capability.   
> This new technology gets you somewhat closer to that ideal.  All it  
> means is that it minimizes power losses due to much lower internal  
> resistance, and reduces limitations that are placed on the  
> performance of the thing you are powering with it.  Even the ideal  
> battery can only deliver as much current into the load as that  
> device will draw based on its own resistance (actually impedance,  
> but we'll keep it simple) Doesn't matter whether it is a motor, a  
> light bulb or whatever.  It's all good...
>
>
> Ed
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Keith Hoard
> To: General pattern discussion
> Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 5:15 PM
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Fwd: New fast charge battery
>
> How good would these batteries work in my glow starter?. . .
>
> 2009/3/19 Ed Alt <ed_alt at hotmail.com>
> No way! That is simply evidence that your paint needs to be upgraded!
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Rex
> To: NSRCA-discussion
> Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 4:33 PM
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Fwd: New fast charge battery
>
> Now I'm just guessing here....  I'm thinking that if you throttle up  
> and the paint
> strips off the fuse, that's probably a bit too much!
>
> Rex
>
> From: joddino at socal.rr.com
> To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:10:06 -0700
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Fwd: New fast charge battery
>
> I used to say that an engine is a machine that doesn't make enough  
> power.  Now I say a motor is also a machine that doesn't make enough  
> power.
>
> Jim
>
>
> On Mar 19, 2009, at 8:29 AM, J N Hiller wrote:
>
> Hay Rex how much power do you need? You can do a vertical ROG now.
> Jim
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
>
> -- 
>
> Keith Hoard
> Collierville, TN
> khoard at gmail.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20090320/1443e352/attachment.html>