[NSRCA-discussion] Landings and Takeoffs

[Ron Van Putte]

John Fuqua's comment was not about how to judge the landing, but why  
we bother.  We spend more time/effort discussing how to judge takeoff  
and (especially) landing than any other maneuvers except ,perhaps,  
snaps and spins.

Ron

On Mar 2, 2009, at 11:23 AM, billglaze wrote:

> In  large part, I agree.  However, when I, (or anybody else) is in  
> the judging chair, it is up to that person to be in a position that  
> inasmuch as possible, all doubt about how to score a figure, is  
> removed.  All I am trying to do is to remove as much doubt as  
> possible; it's possible that some others observing this discourse  
> may also profit from it.
> Bill
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: John Fuqua
> To: General pattern discussion
> Sent: Monday, March 02, 2009 12:11 PM
> Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Landings and Takeoffs
>
> Someone tell me again why we judge 2 NON AEROBATIC manuevers.   If  
> they were aerobatic the FAA would make all airline passengers wear  
> parachutes.   Why do we beat ourselves up over these, the latest  
> discussion of landing zone as an example.
>
> Take off, have some fun, land and get out of the way for the next guy.
>
> F3A finally got it right.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion