[NSRCA-discussion] Landings and Takeoffs

[billglaze]

In  large part, I agree.  However, when I, (or anybody else) is in the judging chair, it is up to that person to be in a position that inasmuch as possible, all doubt about how to score a figure, is removed.  All I am trying to do is to remove as much doubt as possible; it's possible that some others observing this discourse may also profit from it.
Bill
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: John Fuqua 
  To: General pattern discussion 
  Sent: Monday, March 02, 2009 12:11 PM
  Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Landings and Takeoffs


  Someone tell me again why we judge 2 NON AEROBATIC manuevers.   If they were aerobatic the FAA would make all airline passengers wear parachutes.   Why do we beat ourselves up over these, the latest discussion of landing zone as an example.

  Take off, have some fun, land and get out of the way for the next guy.

  F3A finally got is right.  


------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20090302/676d594b/attachment.html>