[NSRCA-discussion] K-Factor morphed into Grow Pattern

[Derek Koopowitz]

Jim (and everyone),
 
The intent is to NOT change the schedules every year... just to give us more
flexibility in changing our rules.

  _____  

From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of J N Hiller
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 10:30 AM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] K-Factor morphed into Grow Pattern


OK guys if you are going to change the schedules every year you need to
change the current mandatory advancement system as well so competitors
aren't advanced prematurely. But we kind of have that problem now.
Jim Hiller
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Derek
Koopowitz
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 10:14 AM
To: 'General pattern discussion'
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] K-Factor morphed into Grow Pattern
 
The AMA has indicated to us that this will be considered - it will
definitely be a rules proposal if everyone agrees.
 
  _____  

From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Budd
Engineering
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 9:51 AM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] K-Factor morphed into Grow Pattern
Now that Dave Brown is gone we should try again.



Budd Engineering
jerry at buddengineering.com
http://www.buddengineering.com
 
On Jan 31, 2009, at 9:18 AM, Gene Maurice wrote:




A BIG difference is that the IMAC schedules are an addendum to the rulebook
and DON'T have to go thru a rules cycle to change. We've tried this and
failed to get it past the AMA. 
Gene Maurice
Plano, TX
AMA 3408 NSRCA 877
PACSS.sgmservice.com
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20090201/64d8a2be/attachment.html>