[NSRCA-discussion] K-Factor morphed into Grow Pattern

[Robert L. Beaubien]

The idea around changing the routines each year is intended to provide a
little change for someone that fly's the same level for more than one
year.  Since Sportsman and Intermediate are definitely not end levels
like Master where the same competitors fly them year after year after
year, the routines can be from a pool of pre approved routines.  

 

Three Sportsman routines can be developed and then rotated on a 3 year
basis.  Same for intermediate.  For that matter, you could use the past
3 different sportsman routines and just rotate them on a yearly basis.
This is nice because it doesn't requires a committee to come up with a
routine every year for those levels.  Advanced might also fall into this
category as well, but definitely not Masters.  They need a routine
committee because pilots can be in that class for years and years and
change to keep things interesting would definitely be needed.

 

- Robert Beaubien

- NSRCA, District 7 Webmaster

-

 

From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of J N
Hiller
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 11:30 AM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] K-Factor morphed into Grow Pattern

 

OK guys if you are going to change the schedules every year you need to
change the current mandatory advancement system as well so competitors
aren't advanced prematurely. But we kind of have that problem now.

Jim Hiller

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Derek
Koopowitz
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 10:14 AM
To: 'General pattern discussion'
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] K-Factor morphed into Grow Pattern

 

The AMA has indicated to us that this will be considered - it will
definitely be a rules proposal if everyone agrees.

 

________________________________

From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Budd
Engineering
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 9:51 AM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] K-Factor morphed into Grow Pattern

Now that Dave Brown is gone we should try again.




Budd Engineering

jerry at buddengineering.com

http://www.buddengineering.com

 

On Jan 31, 2009, at 9:18 AM, Gene Maurice wrote:





A BIG difference is that the IMAC schedules are an addendum to the
rulebook and DON'T have to go thru a rules cycle to change. We've tried
this and failed to get it past the AMA.

 

Gene Maurice

Plano, TX

AMA 3408 NSRCA 877

PACSS.sgmservice.com

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20090131/f7857b9a/attachment.html>