[NSRCA-discussion] K-Factor morphed into Grow Pattern

[J N Hiller]

OK guys if you are going to change the schedules every year you need to
change the current mandatory advancement system as well so competitors aren'
t advanced prematurely. But we kind of have that problem now.
Jim Hiller


-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Derek
Koopowitz
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 10:14 AM
To: 'General pattern discussion'
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] K-Factor morphed into Grow Pattern

The AMA has indicated to us that this will be considered - it will
definitely be a rules proposal if everyone agrees.

  _____

From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Budd
Engineering
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 9:51 AM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] K-Factor morphed into Grow Pattern
Now that Dave Brown is gone we should try again.



Budd Engineering
jerry at buddengineering.com <mailto:jerry at buddengineering.com>
http://www.buddengineering.com

On Jan 31, 2009, at 9:18 AM, Gene Maurice wrote:



A BIG difference is that the IMAC schedules are an addendum to the rulebook
and DON'T have to go thru a rules cycle to change. We've tried this and
failed to get it past the AMA.
Gene Maurice
Plano, TX
AMA 3408 NSRCA 877
PACSS.sgmservice.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20090131/708e2466/attachment.html>