[NSRCA-discussion] BOLLY out of business

Ed Alt ed_alt at hotmail.com
Fri Jan 16 14:01:03 AKST 2009


I would say yes & no.  Swept generally does look better, but it can also be used as a quick cure to a model that doesn't like to stick on landings, by replacing straight gear.

Ed

----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Gray E Fowler 
  To: General pattern discussion 
  Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 12:20 PM
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] BOLLY out of business



  So the answer is cosmetics right?




  Gray Fowler
  Senior Principal Chemical Engineer
  Radomes and Specialty Apertures
  Technical Staff Composites Engineering
  Raytheon 


        Richard Strickland <pamrich47 at hotmail.com> 
        Sent by: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org 
        01/16/2009 11:17 AM Please respond to
              General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 


       To General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>  
              cc  
              Subject Re: [NSRCA-discussion] BOLLY out of business 

              

       



  The long straight legs look very good on all the airplanes I've installed them on--particularly with the pants that were made for them.  I think just a little sweep would look a little better--that's all.  NOT like the sweep on the original straight legged, but swept, Bollys--but those DO look good on the shorter gear.  The amount of sweep I think I'm envisioning is about the same that it would appear to make the gear legs perpendicular to horizontal as the airplane sits.  I do not care much for the looks of the longer, curved, Bolly gear.  All the standard  pants seem too large and butt ugly.  I like them pointier, slimmer, and more elegant.
  RS



------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  From: gfowler at raytheon.com
  Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:37:14 -0600
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] BOLLY out of business


  Why do you prefer sweep?




  Gray Fowler
  Senior Principal Chemical Engineer
  Radomes and Specialty Apertures
  Technical Staff Composites Engineering
  Raytheon 


        Richard Strickland <pamrich47 at hotmail.com> 
        Sent by: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org 01/15/2009 05:17 PM 
              Please respond to
              General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 


       To General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>  
              cc  
              Subject Re: [NSRCA-discussion] BOLLY out of business 


              

       




  If I were to complain about anything on Matt's gear (I'm not) I would prefer a little sweep which would preclude 'a one side fits both" arrangement.  How are most of you guys mounting them--two or three bolts? I've been using three 4-40s but just bought one and the former owner had two per side.

  RS



------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  From: gfowler at raytheon.com
  Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:56:48 -0600
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] BOLLY out of business


  Anthony 

  What did you think about the ES gear twist? That is the wheel going toe in- toe out hitting small bumps. ES had nothing but zero degree fibers. That is the one design issue I am conteplating at the moment. 

  Also considering that all new planes are widebody that is what needs to be addressed..BUT having a 1 continuous gear will be more weight. I am thinking it is better to split the gear for a weight savings.  If we make two pieces, and either piece can be a left or a right, then a broken gear is only on one side. Any advantage to that?




  Gray Fowler
  Senior Principal Chemical Engineer
  Radomes and Specialty Apertures
  Technical Staff Composites Engineering
  Raytheon 

        Anthony Romano <anthonyr105 at hotmail.com> 
        Sent by: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org 01/15/2009 04:18 PM 
              Please respond to
              General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 


       To <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>  
              cc  
              Subject Re: [NSRCA-discussion] BOLLY out of business 



              

       





  Graph Tech is not for us. I am sure their stuff is well suited for the IMAC style planes that they are designed for but too heavy and way too stiff for our use. 
  I went through their website and picked a gear based on dimension of the ES. 2+ ounces heavier and twice as thick with zero flex. Broke the gear out of my Black Magic many times when hitting small holes in the runway. Rick donated his ES gear and life has been much better. 

  Anthony



------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  From: jlachow at hotmail.com
  To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:59:26 -0500
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] BOLLY out of business

  Anyone have any luck with the Graph Tech RC stuff?  Only experience was with some smaller electrics that worked just fine. They have carbon pants and spinners, as well.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  From: tony at radiosouthrc.com
  To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:00:23 -0500
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] BOLLY out of business


  Thanks, Jim.  Those are $112.00 I think… about double that of the Bolly…. Not sure how that will go….. but if there are no other choices… 


  Tony Stillman, President 
  Radio South, Inc. 
  139 Altama Connector, Box 322 
  Brunswick, GA  31525 
  1-800-962-7802 
  www.radiosouthrc.com 



------------------------------------------------------------------------------




  From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Woodward, Jim (US SSA)
  Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 2:52 PM
  To: General pattern discussion
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] BOLLY out of business 

  Tony, 

  Luiz at Net Box Hobby carrys the CA carbon gear. 

  Thanks, 
  Jim 
  From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Tony
  Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 2:36 PM
  To: 'General pattern discussion'
  Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] BOLLY out of business 

  I just received conformation that BOLLY has gone out of business.  Unfortunately, this is a major supplier of CF landing gear and wheel pants.  I have been awaiting a shipment of several items, and now it does not look like that will happen.  I am working now to determine if there are any gear/wheel pants available.   

  The really bad thing is that I am not sure what options we have left, other than going with a kit/arf manufacturer’s gear.  Ed Skorpa dropped his gear last year… 



  Tony Stillman, President 
  Radio South, Inc. 
  139 Altama Connector, Box 322 
  Brunswick, GA  31525 
  1-800-962-7802 
  www.radiosouthrc.com 
   


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Windows Live™ Hotmail®: Chat. Store. Share. Do more with mail. See how it works.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Windows Live™ Hotmail®: Chat. Store. Share. Do more with mail. See how it works._______________________________________________
  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Windows Live™: Keep your life in sync. Check it out._______________________________________________
  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Windows Live™: Keep your life in sync. Check it out._______________________________________________
  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 





------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20090116/16ea6520/attachment.html>


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list