[NSRCA-discussion] BOLLY out of business

Fri Jan 16 08:16:03 AKST 2009

I much prefer a straight gear.  My opinion is that the swept gear originated because the homebuilt guys were making them.  They were doing this because they could mount them to the firewall/engine mount of the aircraft.  I have swept gear only because that is all that is available and it is very easy to rip out of the airplane because of the mechanical vector of forces or “sweep”.  If a straight gear came back it would be great.  Mike

From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Gray E Fowler
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 10:37 AM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] BOLLY out of business

Why do you prefer sweep?

Gray Fowler
Senior Principal Chemical Engineer
Radomes and Specialty Apertures
Technical Staff Composites Engineering
Raytheon 

Richard Strickland <pamrich47 at hotmail.com> 
Sent by: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org 

01/15/2009 05:17 PM 

Please respond to
General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>

To

General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 

cc

Subject

Re: [NSRCA-discussion] BOLLY out of business

If I were to complain about anything on Matt's gear (I'm not) I would prefer a little sweep which would preclude 'a one side fits both" arrangement.  How are most of you guys mounting them--two or three bolts? I've been using three 4-40s but just bought one and the former owner had two per side.

RS

  _____  

To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
From: gfowler at raytheon.com
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:56:48 -0600
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] BOLLY out of business

Anthony 

What did you think about the ES gear twist? That is the wheel going toe in- toe out hitting small bumps. ES had nothing but zero degree fibers. That is the one design issue I am conteplating at the moment. 

Also considering that all new planes are widebody that is what needs to be addressed..BUT having a 1 continuous gear will be more weight. I am thinking it is better to split the gear for a weight savings.  If we make two pieces, and either piece can be a left or a right, then a broken gear is only on one side. Any advantage to that?

Gray Fowler
Senior Principal Chemical Engineer
Radomes and Specialty Apertures
Technical Staff Composites Engineering
Raytheon 

Anthony Romano <anthonyr105 at hotmail.com> 
Sent by: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org 01/15/2009 04:18 PM 

Please respond to
General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>

To

<nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 

cc

Subject

Re: [NSRCA-discussion] BOLLY out of business

Graph Tech is not for us. I am sure their stuff is well suited for the IMAC style planes that they are designed for but too heavy and way too stiff for our use. 
I went through their website and picked a gear based on dimension of the ES. 2+ ounces heavier and twice as thick with zero flex. Broke the gear out of my Black Magic many times when hitting small holes in the runway. Rick donated his ES gear and life has been much better. 

Anthony

  _____  

From: jlachow at hotmail.com
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:59:26 -0500
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] BOLLY out of business

Anyone have any luck with the Graph Tech RC stuff?  Only experience was with some smaller electrics that worked just fine. They have carbon pants and spinners, as well.

  _____  

From: tony at radiosouthrc.com
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:00:23 -0500
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] BOLLY out of business

Thanks, Jim.  Those are $112.00 I think… about double that of the Bolly…. Not sure how that will go….. but if there are no other choices… 

Tony Stillman, President 
Radio South, Inc. 
139 Altama Connector, Box 322 
Brunswick, GA  31525 
1-800-962-7802 
www.radiosouthrc.com 

  _____  

From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Woodward, Jim (US SSA)
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 2:52 PM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] BOLLY out of business 

Tony, 

Luiz at Net Box Hobby carrys the CA carbon gear. 

Thanks, 
Jim 
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Tony
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 2:36 PM
To: 'General pattern discussion'
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] BOLLY out of business 

I just received conformation that BOLLY has gone out of business.  Unfortunately, this is a major supplier of CF landing gear and wheel pants.  I have been awaiting a shipment of several items, and now it does not look like that will happen.  I am working now to determine if there are any gear/wheel pants available.   

The really bad thing is that I am not sure what options we have left, other than going with a kit/arf manufacturer’s gear.  Ed Skorpa dropped his gear last year… 

Tony Stillman, President 
Radio South, Inc. 
139 Altama Connector, Box 322 
Brunswick, GA  31525 
1-800-962-7802 
www.radiosouthrc.com 

  _____  

Windows Live™ Hotmail®: Chat. Store. Share. Do more with mail.  <http://windowslive.com/howitworks?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_t1_hm_justgotbetter_howitworks_012009> See how it works.

  _____  

Windows Live™ Hotmail®: Chat. Store. Share. Do more with mail.  <http://windowslive.com/howitworks?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_t1_hm_justgotbetter_howitworks_012009> See how it works._______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 

  _____  

Windows Live™: Keep your life in sync.  <http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_t1_allup_explore_012009> Check it out._______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20090116/7396c891/attachment.html>