[NSRCA-discussion] Electric/IC ...was Arming Plug/Receptacle Problem

[John Konneker]

I still have a lot of D-W's!

JLK
 


From: atwoodm at paragon-inc.com
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:41:43 -0500
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Electric/IC ...was Arming Plug/Receptacle Problem







And if anyone should still need a Rev-Up 11-7 ¾ prop…I think I still have a bunch of ‘em.  Lol.  
 


From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Richard Strickland
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 9:46 AM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Electric/IC ...was Arming Plug/Receptacle Problem
 
Ah, Rossi short stroke RE, non muffled tuned pipe, 11-71/2 Zinger, screaming at 22,000 rpm on the backside of a split S, pipe 'ringing', prop tips breaking the sound barrier--  Those were some days.  THAT'S when I got fairly adept at using the 'heat transfer device' discussed earlier...
RS
 



Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 06:04:54 -0800
From: edvwhite at yahoo.com
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Electric/IC ...was Arming Plug/Receptacle Problem


And once again Richard dreams the sweet dreams of his beloved EU-1A.

Ed

 




From: Richard Strickland <pamrich47 at hotmail.com>
To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Monday, February 9, 2009 11:48:37 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Electric/IC ...was Arming Plug/Receptacle Problem

Can you make weight?
RS
 
> From: atwoodm at paragon-inc.com
> To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 22:10:36 -0500
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Electric/IC ...was Arming Plug/Receptacle Problem
> 
> 
> Can someone explain to me why we care if the rules favor something? They're the rules. If I wanted to fly Turbine because I think it's the best option, should they change the rules to accommodate my choice?? I thought we MAKE our choice based on how it fits the rules...not the other way around. We have always designed our planes to fit the rules, not altered the rules to fit our planes. Why does this change suddenly because a new power plant is getting close to being viable (it's already there)?? Makes no sense.
> 
> If new batteries came out that weighed 1/3 as much with twice the capacity, suddenly the rules would grossly "favor" electric...and you know what? We would all change, because we pick our equipment to be competitive.
> 
> Changing the rules ruins almost every game, every sport. If eliminates the ability to plan. It limits product selection because manufacturers are even LESS sure of the market. Old products are obsoleted that much quicker...etc.
> 
> Ok...I'm done. Can I fly Turbine pattern now??
> 
> -Mark
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Vicente "Vince" Bortone
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Richard Strickland" <pamrich47 at hotmail.com>
> To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Sent: Monday, February 9, 2009 4:02:59 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Electric/IC ...was Arming Plug/Receptacle Problem
> 
> The rules already favor IC--but we've been down that road...
> RS
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion



Get more out of the Web. Learn 10 hidden secrets of Windows Live. Learn Now
 



Stay up to date on your PC, the Web, and your mobile phone with Windows Live. See Now
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20090210/6adf2e45/attachment.html>