[NSRCA-discussion] Electric/IC ...was Arming Plug/Receptacle Problem
Chris Moon
cjm767driver at hotmail.com
Mon Feb 9 19:00:16 AKST 2009
Wait till you see my infinite improbability drive in action!!
Turbine power is already old school
Chris
Doug Cronkhite wrote:
> Atwood, Mark wrote:
>
> The only rules change that really should be considered for AMA is to
> raise the weight limit by 1 pound so people who can't afford $4000 for
> an airframe can more easily get whatever propulsion choice they decide
> upon to make weight. The more difficult you make it for people to join
> the club, the smaller the club gets.
>
> I don't really see the rules actually favoring either side at the
> moment..
>
> Glow is easier to make weight. Electric never changes weight in flight
> so less apt to trim changes.
> Glow is cheaper for the initial investment. Electric front-loads the
> 'fuel' costs.
> Glow is messy. Electric requires new learning but doesn't leave a
> smoke trail (unless something really bad happens)..
>
> Ok.. that last one might be an advantage for Electric over glow.
>
> Don't change the rules just to change them. If there is a NEED to
> change them, that's one thing, but right now I don't see a terrible
> problem with either choice being that hard to compete with over the
> other.
>
> Mark.. no turbine pattern for you. Hydrogen Fuel-Cell pattern.. that's
> where it's at!
>
> -Doug
>
>
>
>> Can someone explain to me why we care if the rules favor something?
>> They're the rules. If I wanted to fly Turbine because I think it's
>> the best option, should they change the rules to accommodate my
>> choice?? I thought we MAKE our choice based on how it fits the
>> rules...not the other way around. We have always designed our
>> planes to fit the rules, not altered the rules to fit our planes.
>> Why does this change suddenly because a new power plant is getting
>> close to being viable (it's already there)?? Makes no sense.
>>
>> If new batteries came out that weighed 1/3 as much with twice the
>> capacity, suddenly the rules would grossly "favor" electric...and you
>> know what? We would all change, because we pick our equipment to be
>> competitive.
>>
>> Changing the rules ruins almost every game, every sport. If
>> eliminates the ability to plan. It limits product selection because
>> manufacturers are even LESS sure of the market. Old products are
>> obsoleted that much quicker...etc.
>>
>> Ok...I'm done. Can I fly Turbine pattern now??
>>
>> -Mark
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Vicente "Vince" Bortone
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Richard Strickland" <pamrich47 at hotmail.com>
>> To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>> Sent: Monday, February 9, 2009 4:02:59 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Electric/IC ...was Arming
>> Plug/Receptacle Problem
>>
>> The rules already favor IC--but we've been down that road...
>> RS
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list