[NSRCA-discussion] Digital Pug-In module

[Ihncheol Park]

John,

Some people use 2.4Ghz wireless router antenna on the module.  That way, you don't have to worry about the antenna wire on the back.  Much better installation?  I don't know since, I use the module as is.

So far, I've sold dozens of Spektrum modules for Futaba 7U, 8U, 9C/Z.  None for the higher end TX other than the Futaba module sets.

I posted some pictures at RCU on 9Z installation of Spektrum Module.  

http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_6337454/anchors_6916950/mpage_1/key_/anchor/tm.htm#6916950

9C is relatively simple also. 

Ihncheol



--- On Tue, 8/25/09, John Pavlick <jpavlick at idseng.com> wrote:

> From: John Pavlick <jpavlick at idseng.com>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Digital Pug-In module
> To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Date: Tuesday, August 25, 2009, 2:19 PM
> I
> have one of the Spektrum modules for Futaba in my 12Z. Yes
> it's a good deal and they work fine but the one
> that I have gets its signal through the trainer
> port NOT the RF module connector. This means
> there's an additional wire dangling out the back and
> you're going through the analog trainer port. The 9c
> module may be different so check that before you make a
> decision. The other thing is the antenna connector + wire +
> adapter. It's kind of a cob job. It works but it aint
> pretty. I did see a nice screw-on 2.4 GHz antenna somewhere
> but I can't remember where. That would clean things
> up considerably.
>  
> John Pavlick
> 
> --- On Tue, 8/25/09, Larry Krutz
> <lkrutz89503 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> From: Larry Krutz <lkrutz89503 at yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Digital Pug-In module
> To: "General pattern discussion"
> <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Date: Tuesday, August 25, 2009, 2:59 PM
> 
> 
> I have a Futaba 9C currently on 72
> MHZ. I see that both Futaba and Spektrum have conversion
> packages for 2.4 access. Any comments on either or both?
> (Spektrum is offering a good price right now!) Thanx--
> Larry
> 
> --- On Tue, 8/25/09, Jay Marshall <lightfoot at sc.rr.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > From: Jay Marshall <lightfoot at sc.rr.com>
> > Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Digital Pug-In module
> > To: "'General pattern discussion'"
> <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> > Date: Tuesday, August 25, 2009, 7:41 AM
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >
>  
> >  
> > 
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Can’t
> > speak to JR, but the plug-in
> > 2.4 module on my Futaba 9C has worked fine. The only
> > problem is that if you use
> > a tray it will probably have to be
> > modified.
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Jay Marshall 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original
> > Message-----
> > 
> > From:
> > nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
> > [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]
> On Behalf Of
>  Bill Glaze
> > 
> > Sent:
> > Tuesday, August 25,
> > 2009
> > 10:32
> > AM
> > 
> > To:
> > General pattern
> >  discussion
> > 
> > Subject:
> > [NSRCA-discussion]
> > Digital Pug-In module
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > All:
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > I bought from
> > a pattern fllyer, a JR
> > 9393 Transmitter and receiver on 72 megs, with a
> frequency
> > synthesizer, 
> > While I do prefer to fly on 6 meters, I thought I
> might use
> > this transmitter
> > with a 6 meter synthesizer.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > However, a
> > good friend of mine
> > suggested getting a conversion unit and go directly to
> 2.4
> > Gig.  I know
> > that it's  definitely the coming thing, even
> > though I've been satisfied
> > with the older system.
> >
>  
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > However, (and
> > this is where my doubt
> > comes in) I was told by a hobby shop owner, that he
> > "doesn't trust the 2.4
> > module, because, it's a basically a converter,
> and
> > because the entire system
> > wasn't designed to be used at 2.4 Gig to begin
> with, he
> > doubts the plug-in
> > module's reliability or safety of
> flight." 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Any advice
> > will be appreciated.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Bill
> > Glaze
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 
> 
>       
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion