[NSRCA-discussion] Digital Pug-In module

[Vicente "Vince" Bortone]

Dave, 



I was able to notice when doing snaps only.  No difference in normal fly.  Thanks, 

Vicente "Vince" Bortone 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dave" <DaveL322 at comcast.net> 
To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 10:14:29 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central 
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Digital Pug-In module 




Vince, 



Yes, servo sync matches servo outputs when using mixing. 



The 10X is faster in PPM mode (compared to PCM), and PPM mode is used when adding the 2.4 module.  The 2.4 module adds a small bit of latency, but the net result is still a tiny bit faster than pure PCM – difference is small enough that I don’t know anyone who noticed a difference between PCM and PPM w/ 2.4. 



Regards, 


Dave Lockhart 

Team JR 












From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Vicente "Vince" Bortone 
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 11:09 AM 
To: General pattern discussion 
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Digital Pug-In module 





Actually I remember the 10X been a little faster using 2.4 modules when compared with the 72 Mhz system.   I am not sure about the 9303 but I assume is similar.  



Vicente "Vince" Bortone 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Anthony Frackowiak" <frackowiak at sbcglobal.net> 
To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 9:39:44 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central 
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Digital Pug-In module 

I flew the 2.4 module a lot in a 9303 before the pure 2.4 systems came out. No problems, however you do not have some of the nice features that come with the pure 2.4 systems. Such as Modelmatch does not work with the module systems. And the pure 2.4 systems are faster. But reliability is not a concern. 





Tony 









On Aug 25, 2009, at 7:31 AM, Bill Glaze wrote: 







All: 


I bought from a pattern fllyer, a JR 9393 Transmitter and receiver on 72 megs, with a frequency synthesizer,  While I do prefer to fly on 6 meters, I thought I might use this transmitter with a 6 meter synthesizer. 


However, a good friend of mine suggested getting a conversion unit and go directly to 2.4 Gig.  I know that it's  definitely the coming thing, even though I've been satisfied with the older system. 


However, (and this is where my doubt comes in) I was told by a hobby shop owner, that he "doesn't trust the 2.4 module, because, it's a basically a converter, and because the entire system wasn't designed to be used at 2.4 Gig to begin with, he doubts the plug-in module's reliability or safety of flight."  


Any advice will be appreciated. 





Bill Glaze 

_______________________________________________ 
NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 


I bought from a pattern fllyer, a JR 9393 Transmitter and receiver on 72 megs, with a frequency synthesizer,  While I do prefer to fly on 6 meters, I thought I might use this transmitter with a 6 meter synthesizer. 


However, a good friend of mine suggested getting a conversion unit and go directly to 2.4 Gig.  I know that it's  definitely the coming thing, even though I've been satisfied with the older system. 


However, (and this is where my doubt comes in) I was told by a hobby shop owner, that he "doesn't trust the 2.4 module, because, it's a basically a converter, and because the entire system wasn't designed to be used at 2.4 Gig to begin with, he doubts the plug-in module's reliability or safety of flight."  


Any advice will be appreciated. 





Bill Glaze 

_______________________________________________ 
NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 




_______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion mailing list NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 
_______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion mailing list NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20090825/2532bc0e/attachment.html>