[NSRCA-discussion] Digital Pug-In module

[Dave Burton]

Bill, Ditto for me. I’ve got two 10X transmitters with the 2.4 modules I started flying last year and so far no problems. I thought it was cost effective way to begin transition to 2.4 and I’ll eventually buy  pure 2.4 TX transmitters.

Dave Burton

 

From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Vicente "Vince" Bortone
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 10:40 AM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Digital Pug-In module

 

Bill,

 

I have been using the 2.4 on JR 10X in the last 3 seasons and never had any problem.  Actually, I noticed that it is a lot safer when using gasoline engines.  I will guess that it is the same when using YS-CDI engines.  It is more immune to RF problems.  

Vicente "Vince" Bortone

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Glaze" <billglaze at bellsouth.net>
To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 9:31:46 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Digital Pug-In module

All: 

I bought from a pattern fllyer, a JR 9393 Transmitter and receiver on 72 megs, with a frequency synthesizer,  While I do prefer to fly on 6 meters, I thought I might use this transmitter with a 6 meter synthesizer.

However, a good friend of mine suggested getting a conversion unit and go directly to 2.4 Gig.  I know that it's  definitely the coming thing, even though I've been satisfied with the older system.

However, (and this is where my doubt comes in) I was told by a hobby shop owner, that he "doesn't trust the 2.4 module, because, it's a basically a converter, and because the entire system wasn't designed to be used at 2.4 Gig to begin with, he doubts the plug-in module's reliability or safety of flight."  

Any advice will be appreciated.

 

Bill Glaze


_______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion mailing list NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20090825/5758581e/attachment.html>