[NSRCA-discussion] Digital Pug-In module

[Vicente "Vince" Bortone]

Bill, 



I have been using the 2.4 on JR 10X in the last 3 seasons and never had any problem.  Actually, I noticed that it is a lot safer when using gasoline engines.  I will guess that it is the same when using YS-CDI engines.  It is more immune to RF problems.   

Vicente "Vince" Bortone 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill Glaze" < billglaze @ bellsouth .net> 
To: "General pattern discussion" < nsrca -discussion at lists. nsrca .org> 
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 9:31:46 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central 
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Digital Pug-In module 


All: 
I bought from a pattern fllyer , a JR 9393 Transmitter and receiver on 72 megs, with a frequency synthesizer,  While I do prefer to fly on 6 meters, I thought I might use this transmitter with a 6 meter synthesizer. 
However, a good friend of mine suggested getting a conversion unit and go directly to 2.4 Gig.  I know that it's  definitely the coming thing, even though I've been satisfied with the older system. 
However, (and this is where my doubt comes in) I was told by a hobby shop owner, that he "doesn't trust the 2.4 module, because, it's a basically a converter, and because the entire system wasn't designed to be used at 2.4 Gig to begin with, he doubts the plug-in module's reliability or safety of flight."  
Any advice will be appreciated. 

Bill Glaze 
_______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion mailing list NSRCA-discussion at lists. nsrca .org http ://lists. nsrca .org/mailman/ listinfo / nsrca -discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20090825/42b3e4d5/attachment.html>