<html><head><style type='text/css'>p { margin: 0; }</style></head><body><div style='font-family: Arial; font-size: 12pt; color: #000000'><P>Bill,</P>
<P> </P>
<P>I have been using the 2.4 on JR 10X in the last 3 seasons and never had any problem. Actually, I noticed that it is a lot safer when using gasoline engines. I will guess that it is the same when using YS-CDI engines. It is more immune to RF problems. <BR><BR>Vicente "Vince" Bortone<BR><BR>----- Original Message -----<BR>From: "Bill Glaze" <billglaze@bellsouth.net><BR>To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org><BR>Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 9:31:46 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central<BR>Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Digital Pug-In module<BR><BR></P>
<STYLE></STYLE>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>All: </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I bought from a pattern fllyer, a JR 9393 Transmitter and receiver on 72 megs, with a frequency synthesizer, While I do prefer to fly on 6 meters, I thought I might use this transmitter with a 6 meter synthesizer.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>However, a good friend of mine suggested getting a conversion unit and go directly to 2.4 Gig. I know that it's definitely the coming thing, even though I've been satisfied with the older system.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>However, (and this is where my doubt comes in) I was told by a hobby shop owner, that he "doesn't trust the 2.4 module, because, it's a basically a converter, and because the entire system wasn't designed to be used at 2.4 Gig to begin with, he doubts the plug-in module's reliability or safety of flight." </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Any advice will be appreciated.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Bill Glaze</FONT></DIV><BR>_______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion mailing list NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</div></body></html>