[NSRCA-discussion] Masters Avalanche question

Steven Maxwell patternrules at yahoo.com
Mon Apr 6 19:00:13 AKDT 2009


 I wasn't offended by any of this as I, like anyone else have gotten scores that I didn't deserve, it was just one time when I knew it was wrong and none of the judges caught it. 
 Making a maneuver look as good as possible isn't cheating more like working to the best looking as it can get.
 I have watched FAI finals from the road at the nats and then you can really see what true working a maneuver is.
Sorry if my statement was taken wrong by anyone.
 Steve 


--- On Mon, 4/6/09, Jon Lowe <jonlowe at aol.com> wrote:

> From: Jon Lowe <jonlowe at aol.com>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Masters Avalanche question
> To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> Date: Monday, April 6, 2009, 9:58 PM
> Hey Chuck, you can't say ANYTHING anymore without
> offending someone.  
> One radio commentator calls us the "United States of
> the Offended".
> 
> BTW, I cheat as much as possible when I fly.  I also seem
> to get caught 
> a lot, especially when my "cheat" makes things
> worse. After all, wrong 
> rudder is the most powerful force in the universe,
> isn't it?!
> 
> 
> Jon Lowe
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chuck Hochhalter <cahochhalter at yahoo.com>
> To: General pattern discussion
> <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Sent: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 8:05 pm
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Masters Avalanche question
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> I apologize if anyone took offense to my cheating comment. 
>  My entire
> flight is a cheat to avoid zeros.  It was meant to be
> humorous.  Every
> correction made is a "cheat" we hope is not
> noticed so we receive the
> highest score possible. 
>  
> 
> Chuck Hochhalter 
>  
> 
> -------------------------------------------------- 
> 
> From: "billglaze"
> <billglaze at bellsouth.net> 
> Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 4:55 PM 
> 
> To: "General pattern discussion"
> <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Masters Avalanche
> question 
>  
> 
> > AHA!  So, that was you!!  Bill Glaze 
> 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Dave Burton"
> <burtona at atmc.net> 
> > To: <patternrules at yahoo.com>; "'General
> pattern discussion'"
> > <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 
> > Sent: Monday, April 06, 20
> 09 5:09 PM 
> 
> > Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Masters Avalanche
> question 
> 
>> 
>> 
> >> At a contest last week end I failed to do a half
> roll at the bottom 
> of
> >> the 
> 
> >> triangle. I realized what I had done after pulling
> to the up line 
> and 
> 
> >> skillfully did a full roll to get back in inverted
> position for the
> >> figure 
> 
> >> 9. Both judges zeroed the triangle for missing the
> first half roll 
> but 
> 
> >> neither caught the full roll to get back inverted
> until I told them 
> after 
> 
> >> the flight. 
> 
> >> Dave Burton 
> 
> >> 
> 
> >> -----Original Message----- 
> 
> >> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org 
> 
> >> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]
> On Behalf Of 
> Steven 
> 
> >> Maxwell 
> 
> >> Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 4:23 PM 
> 
> >> To: General pattern discussion 
> 
> >> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Masters Avalanche
> question 
> 
> >> 
> 
> >> 
> 
> >> Actually I did a wrong maneuver at a contest the
> district 
> championships I 
> 
> >> only seen my scores after they had been put in the
> computer I told 
> the CD 
> 
> >> that it should have been a zero and the next 2
> maneuver also should 
> have 
> 
> >> been zero, till I corrected my position. 
> 
> >> Steve Maxwell 
> 
> >> 
> 
> >> 
> 
> >> --- On Mon, 4/6/09, Dennis Cone
> <patternpilot at verizon.net> wrote:C2
> 
> >> 
> 
> >>> From: Dennis Cone
> <patternpilot at verizon.net> 
> >>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Masters
> Avalanche question 
> 
> >>> To: "'General pattern
> discussion'" 
> <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 
> >>> Date: Monday, April 6, 2009, 3:27 PM 
> 
> >>> I once was at a contest flying Masters in
> which I found 
> 
> >>> myself right side up 
> 
> >>> when I should have been inverted. We were
> flying into the 
> 
> >>> sun so I pulled 
> 
> >>> vertical right into the suns path, did the
> required 
> 
> >>> maneuver and when I 
> 
> >>> reached the sun I rolled and pushed out of the
> maneuver. I 
> 
> >>> was then in the 
> 
> >>> right position for the next maneuver. A round
> later I was 
> 
> >>> calling for Frank 
> 
> >>> Capone and he did the same thing. So I
> whispered to him to 
> 
> >>> pull into the sun 
> 
> >>> and roll right when he could not see it.
> Neither one of us 
> 
> >>> got caught. Was 
> 
> >>> it cheating? Perhaps, but I like to call it
> creative 
> 
> >>> flying. It was not 
> 
> >>> planned, so really not cheating. I'm sure
> everyone has 
> 
> >>> done a maneuver 
> 
> >>> incorrectly and was not caught by the judges.
> Did you tell 
> 
> >>> them to zero it? 
> 
> >>> Probably not. 
> 
> >>> 
> 
> >>> Dennis 
> 
> >>> 
> 
> >>> -----Original Message----- 
> 
> >>> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at li
> sts.nsrca.org 
> 
> >>>
> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On
> Behalf 
> 
> >>> Of Ron Van Putte 
> 
> >>> Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 6:13 AM 
> 
> >>> To: General pattern discussion 
> 
> >>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Masters
> Avalanche question 
> 
> >>> 
> 
> >>> It's only cheating if you get caught. 
> 
> >>> 
> 
> >>> Ron 
> 
> >>> 
> 
> >>> On Apr 5, 2009, at 9:54 PM, Chuck Hochhalter
> wrote: 
> 
> >>> 
> 
> >>> > Ron, that is cheating, you should
> immediately point 
> 
> >>> out to the 
> 
> >>> > judges that you lead the snap in order to
> preserve the 
> 
> >>> geometry of 
> 
> >>> > the maneuver. 
> 
> >>> > 
> 
> >>> >
> -------------------------------------------------- 
> 
> >>> > From: "Ronald Van Putte" 
> 
> >>> <vanputte at cox.net> 
> >>> > Sent: Sunday, April 05, 2009 7:34 PM 
> 
> >>> > To: "General pattern
> discussion" 
> 
> >>> <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 
> >>> > Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Masters
> Avalanche 
> 
> >>> question 
> 
> >>> > 
> 
> >>> >> What you can try is easing some yaw
> in by putting 
> 
> >>> in a bit of 
> 
> >>> >> left  rudder just before entering the
> snap (the 
> 
> >>> judges probably 
> 
> >>> >> won't even  notice). 
> 
> >>> >> 
> 
> >>> >> Ron 
> 
> >>> >> 
> 
> >>> >> On Apr 5, 2009, at 6:13 PM, Keith
> Black wrote: 
> 
> >>> >> 
> 
> 
> >>> >>> I'm having trouble with the
> Masters 
> 
> >>> Avalanche and wanted to see 
> 
> >>> >>> if anyone had any suggestions or
> was 
> 
> >>> experiencing the same problem. 
> 
> >>> >>> 
> 
> >>> >>> 
> 
> >>> >>> 
> 
> >>> >>> Entering the maneuver left to
> right then 
> 
> >>> pushing the half loop 
> 
> >>> >>> to  the snap, If I attempt a
> positive snap to 
> 
> >>> the right (which 
> 
> >>> >>> rotates  the plane away from the
> flight line) 
> 
> >>> the nose comes 
> 
> >>> >>> around nicely  to complete the
> arch of the 
> 
> >>> loop, but ends 
> 
> >>> >>> pointing about 20  degrees away
> from the 
> 
> >>> flight line. If I stay 
> 
> >>> >>> on the rudder after  the snap I
> can 
> 
> >>> immediately put the plane 
> 
> >>> >>> back in line, but it's  quite
> ugly and 
> 
> >>> obvious rather than 
> 
> >>> >>> smoothly exiting the snap 
> parallel to the 
> 
> >>> flight line. I've 
> 
> >>> >>> tried using less rudder, but have
>  not been 
> 
> >>> able to get that to 
> 
> >>> >>> work any better. 
> 
> >>> >>> 
> 
> >>> >>> 
> 
> >>> >>> 
> 
> >>> >>> I've also tried an outside
> snap but to me 
> 
> >>> this looks terrible 
> 
> >>> >>> and  the nose is elevated on
> exit. 
> 
> >>> >>> 
> 
> >>> >>> 
> 
> >>> >>> 
> 
> >>> >>> The plane is a Beryll. 
> =0
> A
> >>> >>> 
> 
> >>> >>> 
> 
> >>> >>> 
> 
> >>> >>> Any suggestions would be greatly
> appreciated. 
> 
> >>> >>> 
> 
> >>> >>> 
> 
> >>> >>> 
> 
> >>> >>> Thanks, 
> 
> >>> >>> 
> 
> >>> >>> Keith Black 
> 
> >>> >>> 
> 
> >>> >>> 
> 
> >>>
> _______________________________________________ 
> 
> >>> >>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
> 
> >>> >>>
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
> 
> >>> >>> 
> 
> >>>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 
> 
> >>> >> 
> 
> >>> >>
> _______________________________________________ 
> 
> >>> >> NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
> 
> >>> >> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
> 
> >>> >> 
> 
> >>>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 
> 
> >>> > 
> 
> >>> > 
> 
> >>> >
> _______________________________________________ 
> 
> >>> > NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
> 
> >>> > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
> 
> >>> > 
> 
> >>>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 
> 
> >>> 
> 
> >>>
> _______________________________________________ 
> 
> >>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
> 
> >>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
> 
> >>>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 
> 
> >>> 
> 
> >>>
> _______________________________________________ 
> 
> >>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
> 
> >>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
> 
> >>>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 
> 
> >> 
> 
> >> 
> 
> >> 
> 
> >> 
> 
> 
> 
> >> _______________________________________________ 
> 
> >> NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
> 
> >> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
> 
> >>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 
> 
> >> 
> 
> >> 
> 
> >> _______________________________________________ 
> 
> >> NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
> 
> >> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
> 
> >>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 
> 
> >> 
> 
>> 
>> 
> > _______________________________________________ 
> 
> > NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
> 
> > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
> 
> >
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion  
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> 
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
> 
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
> 
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


      



More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list