[NSRCA-discussion] Snap rolls
John Pavlick
jpavlick at idseng.com
Tue Sep 23 09:16:48 AKDT 2008
Yeah but if you REALLY want to make sure you get a 9.5 (like I did) you have to be flying a Black Magic! LOL
John Pavlick
--- On Tue, 9/23/08, JShulman <jshulman at cfl.rr.com> wrote:
From: JShulman <jshulman at cfl.rr.com>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Snap rolls
To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Date: Tuesday, September 23, 2008, 4:38 PM
Try leading with the elevator first for '9.5's', or like my '9' snaps, just go to the corners at the same time.
Regards,
Jason
www.jasonshulman.com
www.shulmanaviation.com
www.composite-arf.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Bob Wilson
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 12:24 PM
To: aabdu at sbcglobal.net; General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Snap rolls
Ah..ha, just as I suspected. The conversation got out of hand, but sure is enjoyable reading.
Obviously, my snap roll technique was flawed and I can't wait for flying tonight so I can work on the improvements.
Thanks guys
bw
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Anthony Abdullah <aabdu at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
I like that idea!! The rudder could even be mixed to low throttle so each half moves in opposite directions for downline braking, or would that just cause the plane to spin, which could also be cool.
--- On Tue, 9/23/08, rcmaster199 at aol.com <rcmaster199 at aol.com> wrote:
From: rcmaster199 at aol.com <rcmaster199 at aol.com>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Snap rolls
To: homeremodeling2003 at yahoo.com, nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Date: Tuesday, September 23, 2008, 11:30 AM
Woa Ed....A one piece rudder wouldn't move much at all so how could it
scrape the bench....who are you trying to chide??
That gives me an idea....maybe we should build elevators as 1 piece and
rudders as 2 piece. Split rudders will eliminate any belly or canopy
pitching. If each half was driven with a separate servo on separate
channels, they might be programmed to move differentially and eliminate
roll couple also. QED!!
Just in case you forgot to trim your triangle, this is a simpler
shearing of the hair
Matt
-----Original Message-----
From: krishlan fitzsimmons <homeremodeling2003 at yahoo.com>
To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 1:46 am
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Snap rolls
Did you put the elevator upside down Ed? You have to make sure you put
the non scraping side down..
Chris
--- On Mon, 9/22/08, Ed Alt <ed_alt at hotmail.com> wrote:
From: Ed Alt <ed_alt at hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Snap rolls
To: "General pattern discussion"
<nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Date: Monday, September 22, 2008, 10:03 PM
I just tried that. Something doesn't look
exactly right and the elevator is scraping the workbench now. What am
I
doing wrong?
Ed
----- Original Message -----
From:
JShulman
To: General pattern discussion
Sent:
Monday, September 22, 2008 11:30
PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Snap
rolls
swap rudder
with elevator
Regards,
Jason
www.jasonshulman.com
www.shulmanaviation.com
www.composite-arf.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Bob
Wilson
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 12:24 AM
To:
General pattern discussion
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Snap
rolls
I'm probably opening this up for lots of discussion, but what is
the
correct technique for a snap?
For an inside snap, I apply rudder a fraction before (same
direction)
aileron and up elevator.
For an outside snap, I apply rudder a fraction before opposite
aileron
and down elevator.
Problem is, I watch the big boys do snaps on my TOC videos and
mine look so raggedy-ass.
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion
mailing
list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
=0
Ahttp://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20080923/2bf35326/attachment.html>
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list