[NSRCA-discussion] Fwd: Altitude limits

Wed Jan 23 09:55:06 AKST 2008

I believe Chris is right on the money here.  The real intent was to stop people from flying UAV's (of any size) for commercial purposes and claiming the authority to fly those was AC 91-57 (which has no airworthiness requirements) and was intended only for hobbyists.

Ed

chris moon <cjm767driver at hotmail.com> wrote:    .hmmessage P { margin:0px; padding:0px } body.hmmessage { FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY:Tahoma }    Here is the important excerpt from the clarification of policy letter:

 "Model aircraft should be flown below 400 feet above the
 surface to avoid other aircraft in flight."

 There is a BIG difference as far as the feds are concerned between the words "should" "shall" and "must".  We are not regularly above 400 feet throughout a flight and frankly have no means of determining our altitude accurately, so I don't see how this is any big change for us.  The intent was of course to regulate the big UAV craft and they had to mention our models so that the big UAV guys could not claim their planes were just hobbyist models.

 Chris

 James Oddino wrote: 

   Begin forwarded message:

             From: Bryan Hudson <gbflyer at sbcglobal.net>
     Date: January 22, 2008 10:00:42 PM PST
     To: James Oddino <joddino at socal.rr.com>
     Subject: Re: Fwd: [NSRCA-discussion] Altitude limits

     Jim,

     That used to be correct up till Feburary last year. Long story short. FAA (Advisory Circular) AC 91-57 for model airplanes has been around since 1981. It "advises" fly models below 400 feet AGL (above ground level). Because of the growing unmanned aircraft industry, last February the NTSB / FAA issued a "Policy Statement" in the Federal Register officially making AC 91-57 the "Authority" under which models will be flown. So as of last Feb. fly below 400 AGL is federal law. This information has recently been added to the FAA's own web site, and now it looks like the new policy is being enforced. 

     New regulation on FAA's web site www.faa.gov

     To fly a UAS you must have an (Experimental Airworthiness Certificate) EAC, unless you are a hobbyist and intend to fly your model aircraft in accordance with the guidance in AC 91-57 "Model Aircraft Operating Standards.”

     In other words, if you want to fly higher than AC 91-57 allows (above 400 AGL) then you must have an EAC. EACs are not being issued to modelers so don't even think about that.

     You can find the Federal Register Policy Statement that lays this out on this site also. 

     Go to 
     www.faa.gov     

     then click on:

     Aircraft Tab 
     Aircraft Topics - Aircraft Certification
     Design Approvals
     Types of Aircraft - Unmanned Aircraft

          At this point click on Regulations and Policies for links to::

   Advisory Circulars - AC 91-57 Model Aircraft Operating Standards        
   Policies - Federal Register Notice – Clarification of FAA Policy      
     Or after Unmanned Aircraft click on FAQ for statement on FAA's web site.

     Bryan

     James Oddino <joddino at socal.rr.com> wrote:

       Begin forwarded message:

                         From: Ed White <edvwhite at sbcglobal.net>
         Date: January 21, 2008 1:13:55 PM PST
         To: NSRCA Mailing List <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
         Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Altitude limits
         Reply-To: NSRCA Mailing List <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>

 It is written in FAA Advisory Circular AC 91-57, dated June 9, 1981. You can download it from the the FAA website (www.faa.gov and then type AC 91-57 into the search box).

 It says "Do not fly model aircraft higher than 400 feet above the surface." This applies to any location. But because the next sentence says "When flying aircraft within 3 miles of an airport, notify the airport operator ..." some people misinterpret the requirement as 400 feet only when within 3 miles of an airport.

 The key point is that it is an ADVISORY Circular. It outlines the FAA's preferred model aircraft operating standards, but compliance with the AC is voluntary. An AC is not the same as a FAR (Federal Aviation Regulation). 

 Ed

         Mark Atwood <atwoodm at paragon-inc.com> wrote:         It was always my understanding that we were never supposed to exceed 400 ft
 and that full scale aircraft were to stay above 500ft. But I'm not sure
 where that's written...

 -M

 On 1/21/08 2:35 PM, "James Oddino" wrote:

 > I'm getting some breaking news that there is some type of advisory
 > that says we shouldn't be flying above 400 feet at our field in
 > Camarillo. Are there any general rules about altitude limits that we
 > should be aware of? We are pretty far from the Camarillo airport and
 > never get close to any full size stuff so I don't understand why there
 > would be a local restriction. More to follow I'm sure.
 > 
 > Jim O
 > _______________________________________________
 > NSRCA-discussion mailing list
 > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
 > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

 _______________________________________________
 NSRCA-discussion mailing list
           NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
           http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

 _______________________________________________
 NSRCA-discussion mailing list
         NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
         http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion       

---------------------------------
 _______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion mailing list NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

---------------------------------
Connect and share in new ways with Windows Live. Get it now!_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20080123/61e628bc/attachment.html 